• Welcome to Global Gulag Media Forum. Please login or sign up.


Started by #1 Trouble Maker, Apr 07, 2020, 09:32:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Dr. Naomi Hunter

Quote from: #1 Trouble Maker on Apr 05, 2021, 10:26:04 AMWe Have To Say "NO!!" To Totally Insane CDC Following Cult Members Like Karen Here, Or We Are Finished.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/XBv0JF4Fnsqg/  [start video @ 39:18]

Totally insane woman can't even breath because of the 'swastika' covering her face, demands school children ALSO be deprived oxygen.  Obviously the basic instinct to protect our children from totally insane cult following nut jobs like this woman no longer exists in our society.  This is a glaring example of the abuse / tyranny we are ridiculously ALLOWING to be subjected to.  This will NEVER end until WE grow a spine and keep people like this as far away from our children as possible.


Dr. Naomi Hunter

You can't make this up:

So, WEF = Klaus Schwab, global tyrant pushing vax passports, mandatory global death shots, creating "artificial sun", joined at the hip with Bill Gates et.al., tied to Jeffrey Epstein/sex trafficking/child gang rape/torture island:


"BA and MA in History and French, St Hilda's College, University of Oxford; diploma in Education, Edinburgh University. Over 15 years' experience in Silicon Valley, Israel and Los Angeles. Formerly: Senior Adviser, Grameen America, which makes microloans to poor women; co-founded Magellan, the earliest online search engine, acquired by Excite in 1996; experience in television and feature film documentary production, UK and US. Technology Pioneer, World Economic Forum. President Emerita, Commtouch. Director, Israel Venture Network including, since 2004, built up its social entrepreneur programme in Israel. Governor of the Board, since 1999, Peres Center for Peace; since 2003, American Friends of Rabin."


Al Bundy

#1 Trouble Maker

Quote from: Dr. Naomi Hunter on Apr 07, 2021, 09:18:39 AMhttps://twitter.com/KatieDaviscourt/status/1379492274933882881
Mental illness with the full weight of the public / private partnership corporate government in full support.  Whatever happened to... "The only thing to fear, is fear itself"?
Inter Arma Enim Silent Lēgēs
RESISTANCE Is The New Normal

Dr. Naomi Hunter

Quote from: #1 Trouble Maker on Apr 08, 2021, 08:48:01 AMMental illness with the full weight of the public / private partnership corporate government in full support.  Whatever happened to... "The only thing to fear, is fear itself"?
Now take her mentality, and make her into a "defund the police" globalized police replacement.  Can you imagine the corporate police state employers offering someone like her $25-$40 to be your community "contact trace" enforcer, or part of a future United Nations "home inspection team" to make sure you're complying with globalist mandates AT HOME (like how Xiden says you're ALLOWED to have a SMALL gathering in your backyard on the 4th of July-*SINCE* (directly implying that it's a forgone conclusion that you took "your" shots").  Xiden sickeningly invoked "Independence Day" citing "independence from covid (BECAUSE OF "vaccines").

Eventually, replace humans with machines to 100% eliminate ALL conscience and sense of wrongdoing, and this will be the future of vax passport/bi/tri-yearly shots/mask enforcement:


^  Not that far off from this, see Singapore.

#1 Trouble Maker

Quote from: Dr. Naomi Hunter on Apr 08, 2021, 12:48:24 PMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFvqDaFpXeM

^  Not that far off from this, see Singapore.

Don't forget to include the 'Robo-Doctors'.  You can include the scene where the 'test subject' gets blown to Smithereens.  In this scene the head of the board greatly approves.
Inter Arma Enim Silent Lēgēs
RESISTANCE Is The New Normal


well he's dead now ... Is a Deadly virus the next round ?

Prince Philip's Deadly Virus Quote Comes Back to Haunt Him
   Michelle Kapusta  Twitter
July 8, 2020

Prince Philip is known for many things. He's the longest-serving consort in British history, the royal family patriarch, and very outspoken. While he's no stranger to putting his foot in his mouth, his comment about a killer virus is something he probably wishes he could take back now as it's making headlines around the world due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Read on to find out what the Duke of Edinburgh previously said about a deadly virus that is coming back to haunt him now.


Philip's killer virus comment is making headlines again

Back in 1988, the duke brought up overpopulation when speaking to the German news agency Deutsche Press Agentur about reincarnation.

"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation," The Telegraph quoted Philip saying at the time.

#1 Trouble Maker

Quote from: tahoeblue on Apr 09, 2021, 11:47:16 AMwell he's dead now ... Is a Deadly virus the next round ?

No.  They'll just make one up out of thin air in his name.  And the sheep will tremble.
Inter Arma Enim Silent Lēgēs
RESISTANCE Is The New Normal


For Biden ....

Biden makes all adults eligible for a vaccine on April 19

President Joe Biden says he's bumping up his deadline by two weeks for states to make all adults eligible for coronavirus vaccines
April 6, 2021, 9:14 PM
• 6 min read


Making Opportunity Universal
Q1/2021 Matter of Impact Collection

Amidst emerging variants & resulting economic shutdowns, we must act swiftly to achieve a global vaccination rate of up to 70% by the end of 2022. This Action Plan, the first in a series, highlights three mutually reinforcing goals leveraging the power of existing multilateral financial architecture.


New Report Gives Covid-19 Testing Strategies to Help America's Communities Open Safely

Strategies customizable to local pandemic situations

DURHAM, North Carolina | September 9, 2020 – A new, first-of-its kind report provides a framework for public health officials and community leaders in schools, businesses and other institutions on how to use Covid-19 screening test strategies to operate safely and prevent further spread of the virus. The report, A National Decision Point: Effective Testing and Screening for Covid-19, was produced by Duke University's Margolis Center for Health Policy with support from The Rockefeller Foundation. Given the fluctuating prevalence levels of Covid-19 across the country, the report is a useful tool to help officials customize screening strategies of asymptomatic people to local circumstances and risk – with a particular focus on higher-risk populations and suppressing community spread.

It's estimated that 30-60 percent of Covid-19 cases are transmitted from people carrying the virus without any symptoms, putting those around them at significant risk of infection and spread. The testing strategies recommend the best way to identify those infected so they can be isolated until they are no longer contagious, protecting others in the community.

#1 Trouble Maker

Lawsuit Exposes COVID Jabs As Unsafe Transhumanist Gene Therapies


'Globalist capture' of international governments and military operations has apparently tainted the DoD's and DoJ's competence in securing U.S. [& world] National Security in favor of globalization and China's predominant role in geopolitics and economics.
Inter Arma Enim Silent Lēgēs
RESISTANCE Is The New Normal

#1 Trouble Maker

18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a COVID Vaccine
Sourced Links: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/reasons-not-getting-covid-vaccine/

The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products are vaccine makers.

As first established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, vaccine makers cannot be sued — even if they are shown to be negligent.

1. Vaccine makers are immune from liability

The COVID vaccine makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products cause.

If a company is not willing to stand behind its product as safe, especially one rushed to market, I am not willing to take a chance on that product.

No liability. No trust. Here's why ...

2. The checkered past of vaccine companies

The four major companies who are making COVID vaccines are/have either:

Never brought a vaccine to market before COVID (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
Are serial felons (Pfizer, and AstraZeneca).
Are both (Johnson & Johnson).

Moderna had been trying to "Modernize our RNA" (thus the company name) for years, but had never successfully brought any product to market. How nice for the company to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.

In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death — see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide and opioids as a few examples.

If drug companies willfully choose to put harmful products in the market — when they can be sued — why would we trust any product where they have no liability?

Three of the four COVID vaccine makers have been sued for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.

Johnson & Johnson has lost major lawsuits in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2019 (For what it's worth, the company's vaccine also contains tissues from aborted fetal cells, perhaps a topic for another discussion).

Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history. The company  lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. You can check out its rap sheet here. Maybe that's why Pfizer is demanding that countries where they don't have liability protection put up collateral to cover vaccine-injury lawsuits.

AstraZeneca has similarly lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. Here's one. Here's another...you get the point. And in case you missed it, the company had its COVID vaccine suspended in at least 18 countries over concerns of blood clots, and it completely botched its meeting with the FDA with numbers from their study that didn't match.

Oh, and apparently Johnson & Johnson (whose vaccine was granted Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S.) and AstraZenca (whose vaccine is not approved in the U.S.), had a little mix up in their ingredients ... in 15 million doses. Oops.

Given the free pass from liability, and the checkered past of these companies, why would we assume that all their vaccines are safe and made completely above board?

Where else in life would we trust someone with that kind of reputation?

To me that makes as much sense as expecting a remorseless, abusive unfaithful lover to become a different person because a judge said deep down they are a good person.

No. I don't trust them. No liability. No trust. Here's another reason why I don't trust them ...

3. Ugly history of attempts to make coronavirus vaccines

There have been many attempts to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure — which is why we did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020.

In the 1960s, scientists attempted to make an RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) vaccine for infants. In that study, they skipped animal trials because the trials weren't required then.

In the end, the vaccinated infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus in nature, with 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization. Two of them died.

After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines. For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960s.

You can read a summary of this history/science here. Or if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links:

In 2004, attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets.
In 2005, mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated.
In 2012, the ferrets became sick and died. And in this study, mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
In 2016, this study also produced lung disease in mice.
The typical pattern in the studies referenced above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful antibody responses after being vaccinated. The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot.

The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.

When that happened, an unexplained phenomenon called antibody dependent enhancement, also known as vaccine enhanced disease, occurred where the immune system produced a "cytokine storm" (i.e. overwhelmingly attacked the body) and the children/animals died.

Here's the lingering issue: The vaccine makers have no data to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem.

In other words, never before has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the gene-therapy technology in mRNA "vaccines" been safely brought to market.

We might assume that because the companies received billions of dollars in government funding, they must have figured out that problem.

Except they don't know if they have ...

4. The 'data gaps' submitted to FDA by vaccine makers

When vaccine makers submitted their papers to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the Emergency Use Authorization (which is not the same as a full FDA approval), among the many "data gaps" they reported was that they have nothing in their trials to suggest they overcame that pesky problem of vaccine enhanced disease.

They simply don't know if the vaccines they've made will also produce the same cytokine storm (and deaths) as previous attempts at such products.

As Dr. Joseph Mercola points out ...

"Previous attempts to develop an mRNA-based drug using lipid nanoparticles failed and had to be abandoned because when the dose was too low, the drug had no effect, and when dosed too high, the drug became too toxic. An obvious question is: What has changed that now makes this technology safe enough for mass use?"

If that's not alarming enough, here are other gaps in the data — in other words, there is no data to suggest safety or efficacy regarding:

Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55.
Pregnant or lactating mothers.
Autoimmune conditions.
Immunocompromised individuals.
No data on transmission of COVID.
No data on preventing mortality from COVID.
No data on duration of protection from COVID.

In case you think I'm making this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out this, or this respectively. The data gaps can be found starting with page 46 and 48 respectively.

For now let's turn our eyes to the raw data the vaccine makers used to submit for emergency use authorization ...

5. No access to raw data from trials

Would you like to see the raw data that produced the "90% and 95% effective" claims touted in the news?

Me too. But the companies won't let us see that data.

As pointed out in the BMJ, something about the Pfizer and Moderna efficacy claims smells really funny. There were "3,410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group."

Wait ... what? Did they fail to do science in their scientific study by not verifying a major variable?

Could they not test those "suspected but unconfirmed" cases to find out if they had COVID?  Why not test all 3,410 participants for the sake of accuracy?

Can we only guess they didn't test because it would mess up their "90-95% effective" claims?

Would it not be prudent for the FDA to expect (demand) the vaccine makers test people who have "COVID-like symptoms," and release their raw data so independent third parties could examine how the manufacturers justified the numbers?

It's only every citizen of the world we're trying to get to take these experimental products — why did the FDA not require that? Isn't that the entire purpose of the FDA anyway?

Good question. Foxes guarding the hen house? No liability. No trust.

6. No long-term safety testing

With products that have been on the market only a few months, we have no long-term safety data.

In other words, we have no idea what this product will do in the body months or years from now — for any population.

Given all the risks above (risks that all pharmaceutical products have), would it not be prudent to wait to see if the worst-case scenarios have indeed been avoided?

Would it not make sense to want to fill those pesky "data gaps" before we try to give this to every man, woman and child on the planet?

That would make sense. But to have that data, they need to test it on people, which leads me to my next point ...

7. No informed consent

What most who are taking the vaccine don't know is that because these products are still in clinical trials, anyone who gets the shot is now part of the clinical trial — part of the experiment.

Those (like me) who do not take it, are part of the control group. Time will tell how this experiment works out.

But, you may be asking, if the vaccines are causing harm, wouldn't we be seeing that all over the news? Surely the FDA would step in and pause the distribution? (Editor's note: federal health officials on Tuesday paused the Johnsons & Johnson vaccine over concerns related to blood clots).

If the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) — the government-run system for reporting deaths and injuries after vaccines — worked, maybe things would be different, but ...

8. Under-reporting of adverse reactions and deaths

According to a Harvard study (commissioned by our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to VAERS.

While the problems with VAERS have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC), at the time of this writing, VAERS reports over 2,200 deaths from the current COVID vaccines, as well as close to 60,000 adverse reactions.

If those numbers represent only 1% of the total adverse reactions (or .8% to 2% of what this study published recently in the JAMA found), you can do the math — but that equates to somewhere around 110,000 to 220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions.

Bet you didn't see that on the news.

That death number would currently still be lower than the 424,000 deaths from medical errors that happen every year (which you probably also don't hear about), but we are not even six months into the rollout of these vaccines yet.

If you want a deeper dive into the problems with the VAERS reporting system, you can check out this or this.

But then there's my next point, which could be argued makes these COVID vaccines seem pointless ...

9. The vaccines don't stop transmission or infection

Aren't these vaccines supposed to be what we've been waiting for to "go back to normal"? Nope.

Why do you think we're getting all these conflicting messages about needing to practice social distancing and wear masks after we get a vaccine? The reason is because these vaccines were never designed to stop transmission or infection.

If you don't believe me, I refer you again to the papers submitted to the FDA I linked to above which show that the primary endpoint (what the vaccines are meant to accomplish) is to lower your symptoms.

Sounds like just about every other drug on the market right? That's it ... lowering your symptoms is the big payoff we've been waiting for. Does that seem completely pointless to anyone but me?

It can't stop us from spreading the virus.
It can't stop the virus from infecting us once we have it.
To get the vaccine is to accept all the risk of these experimental products and the best it might do is lower symptoms?

There are plenty of other things I can do to lower my symptoms that don't involve taking what appears to be a really risky product.

Now for the next logical question: If we're worried about asymptomatic spreaders, would the vaccine not make it more likely that we are creating asymptomatic spread?

If it indeed reduces symptoms, anyone who gets it might not even know they are sick and thus they are more likely to spread the virus, right?

For what it's worth, I've heard many people say the side effects of the vaccine (especially the second dose) are worse than catching COVID.

I can't make sense of that either.

Take the risk. Get no protection. Suffer through the vaccine side effects. Keep wearing your mask and social distancing ... and continue to be able to spread the virus.

It gets worse ...

10. People are catching COVID after being fully vaccinated

Talk about a bummer. You get vaccinated and you still catch COVID.

It's happening in Washington State.
It's happening in New York.
It's happening in Michigan.
It's happening in Hawaii.
It's happening in several other states too.
It happened to 80% of 35 nuns who got the vaccine in Kentucky. Two of them died by the way.
In reality, this phenomenon is probably happening everywhere, but those are the ones making the news now.

Given the reasons above (and what's below), maybe this doesn't surprise you, but bummer if you thought the vaccine was a shield to keep you safe.

It's not. That was never the point.

If 66% of healthcare workers in L.A. are going to delay or skip the vaccine ... maybe they aren't wowed by the rushed science either.

Maybe they are watching the shady way deaths and cases are being reported ...

11. Overall death rate from COVID

According to the CDC's own numbers, COVID has a 99.74% survival rate.

Why would I take a risk on a product, that doesn't stop infection or transmission, to help me overcome a cold that has a .26% chance of killing me — which actually in my age range is has about a .1% chance of killing me (and .01% chance of killing my kids).

With a bar (death rate) that low, we will be in lockdown every year ... i.e., forever.

But wait, what about the 500,000-plus deaths, that's alarming right? I'm glad you asked ...

12. Bloated COVID death numbers

Something smells really funny about this one. Never before in the history of death certificates has our own government changed how deaths are reported.

Why now, are we reporting everyone who dies with COVID in their body, as having died of COVID, rather than the co-morbidities that actually took their life?

Until COVID, all coronaviruses (common colds) were never listed as the primary cause of death when someone died of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, auto-immune conditions or any other major comorbidity.

The disease was listed as the cause of death, and a confounding factor like flu or pneumonia was listed on a separate line.

To bloat the number even more, the World Health Organization and the CDC changed their guidelines such that those who are suspected or probable (but were never confirmed) of having died of COVID, are also included in the death numbers.

If we are going to do that then should we not go back and change the numbers of all past cold and flu seasons so we can compare apples to apples when it comes to death rates?

According to the CDCs own numbers, (scroll down to the section "comorbidities and other conditions"), only 6% of the deaths being attributed to COVID are instances where COVID seems to be the only issue at hand.

In other words, reduce the death numbers you see on the news by 94% and you have what is likely the real numbers of deaths from just COVID.

Even if the former CDC director is correct and COVID-19 was a lab-enhanced virus (see Reason #14 below), a .26% death rate is still in line with the viral death rate that circles the planet every year.

Then there's this Fauci guy. I'd really love to trust him, but besides the fact that he hasn't treated one COVID patient, you should probably know ...

13. Fauci and others at NIAID own patents on the Moderna vaccine

Thanks to the Bayh-Dole Act, government workers are allowed to file patents on any research they do using taxpayer funding.

Tony Fauci owns more than 1,000 patents (see this video for more details), including patents being used on the Moderna vaccine ... for which he approved government funding.

In fact, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) — which oversees the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), of which Fauci is the director — claims joint ownership of Moderna's vaccine.

Does anyone else see this as a major conflict of interest, or criminal even?

I say criminal because there's also this pesky problem that makes me even more distrustful of Fauci, NIAD, and the NIH in general ...

14. Fauci is on the hot seat for illegal gain-of-function research

What is "gain-of-function" research? It's where scientists attempt to make viruses gain functions — i.e. make them more transmissible and deadlier.

Sounds at least a touch unethical, right? How could that possibly be helpful?

Our government agreed, and 2014, banned the practice.

So what did the Fauci-led NIAID do? They pivoted and outsourced the gain-of-function research (in coronaviruses no less) to China — to the tune of a $600K grant.

Mr. Fauci, you have some explaining to do ... and I hope the cameras are recording when you have to defend your actions.

For now, let's turn our attention back to the virus ...

15. The virus continues to mutate

Not only does the virus (like all viruses) continue to mutate, but according to world-renowned vaccine developer Geert Vanden Bossche (whom you'll meet below if you don't know him) it's mutating about every 10 hours.

How in the world are we going to keep creating vaccines to keep up with that level of mutation? We're not.

Might that also explain why fully vaccinated people are continuing to catch COVID?

Why, given that natural immunity has never ultimately failed humanity, do we suddenly not trust it?

Why, if I ask questions like the above, or post links like what you find above, will my thoughts be deleted from all major social media platforms?

16. Censorship and the complete absence of scientific debate

I can't help but get snarky here, so humor me.

How did you enjoy all those nationally and globally televised, robust debates put on by public health officials, and broadcast simultaneously on every major news station?

Wasn't it great hearing from the best minds in medicine, virology, epidemiology, economics and vaccinology, from all over the world. as they vigorously and respectfully debated things like:

Mask wearing
Vaccine efficacy and safety trials
How to screen for susceptibility to vaccine injury
Therapeutics, (i.e. non-vaccine treatment options)
Wasn't it great seeing public health officials (who never treated anyone with COVID) have their "science" questioned?

Wasn't it great seeing the FDA panel publicly grill the vaccine makers in prime time as they stood in the hot-seat of tough questions about products of which they have no liability?

Oh, wait ... you didn't see those debates? No, you didn't. Because they never happened.

What happened instead was heavy-handed censorship of all but one narrative.

Mark Zuckerberg can question vaccine safety, but I can't? When did the First Amendment become a suggestion?

It's the FIRST Amendment, Mark — the one our founders thought was most important.

With so much at stake, why are we fed only one narrative. Shouldn't many perspectives be heard and professionally debated?

What has happened to science?

What has happened to the scientific method of always challenging our assumptions?

What happened to lively debate in this country, or at least in Western society?

Why did anyone who disagrees with WHO, or the CDC get censored so heavily?

Is the science of public health a religion now — or is science supposed to be about debate?

If someone says "the science is settled" that's how I know I'm dealing with someone who is closed minded. By definition science (especially biological science) is never settled.

If it was, it would be dogma, not science.

I want to be a good citizen. I really do.

If lockdowns work, I want to do my part and stay home.

If masks work, I want to wear them.

If social distancing is effective, I want to comply.

But, if there is evidence they don't (masks for example), I want to hear that

evidence, too.

If highly credentialed scientists have different opinions, I want to know what they think. I want a chance to hear their arguments and make up my own mind.

I don't think I'm the smartest person in the world, but I think I can think. Maybe I'm weird, but if someone is censored, then I really want to hear what they think. Don't you?

To all my friends who don't have a problem with censorship, will you have the same opinion when what you think is censored?

Is censorship not the technique of dictators, tyrants and greedy, power-hungry people?

Is it not a sign that those who are doing the censoring know it's the only way they can win?

What if a man who spent his entire life developing vaccines was willing to put his entire reputation on the line and call on all global leaders to immediately stop the COVID vaccines because of problems with the science?

What if he pleaded for an open-scientific debate on a global stage?

Would you want to hear what he has to say? Would you want to see the debate he's asking for?

17. World's leading vaccinologist is sounding the alarm

Here is what may be the biggest reason this COVID vaccine doesn't make sense to me.

When someone who is very pro-vaccine, who has spent his entire professional career overseeing the development of vaccines, is shouting from the mountaintops that we have a major problem, I think the man should be heard.

In case you missed it, and in case you care to watch it, here is Geert Vanden Bossche, explaining:

Why the COVID vaccine may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating its ability to mutate and become more deadly.

Why the COVID vaccines may be creating vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to antibiotic resistant bacteria).

Why, because of previous problems with antibody dependent enhancement, we may be looking at a mass casualty event in the next few months/years.

[VIDEO] Which Also Can Be Fount @ Bitchute if YouTube deletes it.

If you want to see/read about a second, and longer, interview with Vanden Bossche, where he was asked some tough questions, you can check this out.

If half of what he says comes true, these vaccines could be the worst invention of all time.

If you don't like his science, take it up with him.

I'm just the messenger.

But I can also speak to COVID personally ...

18. I already had COVID

I didn't enjoy it. It was a nasty cold for two days:

Unrelenting butt/low-back aches
Very low energy

Low-grade fever
It was weird not being able to smell anything for a couple days. A week later, coffee still tasted a little "off."

But I survived.

Now it appears (as it always has) that I have beautiful, natural, life-long immunity — not something likely to wear off in a few months if I get the vaccine. In my body, and my household, COVID is over.

In fact, now that I've had it, there is evidence the COVID vaccine might actually be more dangerous for me.

That is not a risk I'm willing to take.

In summary

The above are just my reasons for not wanting the vaccine. Maybe my reasons make sense to you, maybe they don't.

Whatever does makes sense to you, hopefully we can still be friends.

I for one think there's a lot more that we have in common than what separates us.

We all want to live in a world of freedom.
We all want to do our part to help others and to live well.
We all want the right to express our opinions without fearing we'll be censored or viciously attacked.
We all deserve to have access to all the facts so we can make informed decisions.

Agree or disagree with me, I'll treat you no differently.

You're a human just as worthy of love and respect as anyone else. For that I salute you, and I truly wish you all the best.

I hope you found this helpful. If so, feel free to share.

If not, feel free to (kindly) let me know, in the comments below, what didn't make sense to you.

Originally published by TRUE Whole Human.
Inter Arma Enim Silent Lēgēs
RESISTANCE Is The New Normal

#1 Trouble Maker

Corrupt Australia Caught In Massive Vaccine Death Coverup [Go Figure]



The mainstream media does not want anyone to know that sailors in the Australian Navy have been dropping like flies ever since Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccines became available to them.

Numerous stories detailing the horrific adverse events incurred by members of the Australian military have been completely scrubbed from the web. Some of them have been replaced with highly sanitized propaganda pieces claiming that only "mild side effects" are being observed.

Gregg Hunt, Australia's Health Minister, who pushed the experimental gene therapy injections on his nation's military, fell "critically ill" himself just one day after getting jabbed for the Chinese virus. All of this has created major setbacks for the pro-vaccine lobby, which is having an increasingly harder time convincing people to get stabbed.

Fake news outlets like the Daily Mail Online (U.K.) have been pulling stories about deadly vaccine reactions in an attempt to convince people that the jabs are "safe and effective." The cat is already out of the bag, though.

"Our health minister is still in the hospital from the day after he had his injection!" wrote one trusted contact in Australia to Principia Scientific International. "Not a word about the navy hospitalisations. What a way to take out a country's military ... In just one jab!"

As for Health Minister Hunt, early reports that have since been scrubbed indicated that he developed a "suspected infection" following his injection, requiring that he be "kept overnight for observation." Hunt is also "being administered antibiotics and fluid" for his adverse reaction.

More of the latest news about Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccine injuries and deaths can be found at Pandemic.news.

Story continues at links above...

Inter Arma Enim Silent Lēgēs
RESISTANCE Is The New Normal

Al Bundy

Quote from: #1 Trouble Maker on Apr 17, 2021, 12:19:22 AM18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a COVID Vaccine
Sourced Links: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/reasons-not-getting-covid-vaccine/

10. People are catching COVID after being fully vaccinated

Talk about a bummer. You get vaccinated and you still catch COVID.

It's happening in Washington State.
It's happening in New York.
It's happening in Michigan.
It's happening in Hawaii.
It's happening in several other states too.
It happened to 80% of 35 nuns who got the vaccine in Kentucky. Two of them died by the way.
In reality, this phenomenon is probably happening everywhere, but those are the ones making the news now.

Given the reasons above (and what's below), maybe this doesn't surprise you, but bummer if you thought the vaccine was a shield to keep you safe.

Indeed everywhere, few hours ago I met my friend who told that his friends on the work get sick of Covid-19 AFTER
they were vaccinated.

Dr. Naomi Hunter