You are Here:
Keep wasting your time with people like Joe Rogan, who won't tell you about this

Author (Read 3116 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

 

Dr. Naomi Hunter

  • Global Moderator
  • InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 160
    Posts
https://web.archive.org/web/20111027113915/http://www.northcom.mil/News/2008/CAP - For Public Posting - 28 May 08.pdf

USNORTHCOM CONPLAN – A DoD Plan for a National Pandemic
https://www.topsecretwriters.com/2012/10/usnorthcom-conplan-a-dod-plan-for-a-national-pandemic/

Excerpt:
Quote
As far as concerns about the sort of “martial law” depicted in many movies after social unrest breaks out, the document actually states that “DoD forces do not have the authority to provide law enforcement in support of movement restrictions or enforcement of civil law.”

There is one condition where that would change, of course. That would be in the case where:

“…POTUS asserts his authorities under the Constitution and directs Title 10 DOD employment in accordance with the ‘Insurrection Act,” or another exception to the PCA applies.”

...When It Starts to Hit the Fan

If you want to know how bad things could get, all you have to do is read the section of the document that describes what would happen if civil unrest gets so bad that POTUS has to “assert his authorities under the Constitution” and enable the DOD to conduct “homeland defense operations” during an influenza pandemic.

The document explains:

Standing rules of engagement (SROE) will apply the Title 10 forces if the President directs NORTHCOM to conduct air and or maritime homeland defense missions as part of a response to PI.

Air and maritime “defense missions” over the homeland? That almost comes across as predicting the need to conduct military operations against the American population should the need ever arise. These forces would be called “Title 10 forces” under the President’s authority.

The document also explains that under such a state of “martial law”, the government would have the authority to impose medical screening and to restrict the movement of people, and on the “assembly of persons”.

The government would also have the authority to “require manufacturers to give priority for goods and services necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense.”


About 50 percent of CONPLAN 3591 remains classified, including plans for communications and computer systems, information assurance and security, satellite communications, ultra, super and extremely high-frequency high-frequency SATCOM network list, electromagnetic spectrum management, and other interesting areas pertaining to communications, energy and overall national security.

Actual document, CONPLAN 3591:  https://www.governmentattic.org/4docs/USNORTHCOM-CONPLANpandemicFlu_2009.pdf

https://info.publicintelligence.net/US-CA-CivilAssistancePlan-2012.pdf

https://www.csoonline.com/article/2220431/military-plans-to-squash-civil-unrest-in-the-usa.html
Military Plans to Squash Civil Unrest in the USA

Operation LASERhttps://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/more-details-on-operation-laser-the-military-contingency-plan-for-response-to-a-pandemic/

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/operations/military-operations/current-operations/laser.html

Other random document that came up in my searches:  https://www.cfmws.com/en/AboutUs/PSP/DFIT/PSP_Resources/Documents/Project FORCE Phase I Report with signature sheet.pdf



Last Edit by Gladstone
 

 

#1 Trouble Maker

  • Awake
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *
  • 905
    Posts
https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/northcom-influenza.pdf

If you can recover USNorthcom's Conplan 905 from the prison planet archive.  It is the plan to use psyops on the American people during a 'national emergency' AKA pandemic... AKA BLM co-op.. I can't gain access



Last Edit by Gladstone
We got the population brain washed, all in a state of shock.  If you become aware well, we don't particularly care because we have the psy-op industrial complex.
 

 

Dr. Naomi Hunter

  • Global Moderator
  • InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 160
    Posts
From 2004:

https://web.archive.org/web/20041208020613/http://page15.com/2004/07/evidence-of-pentagon-psychological.html

Friday, July 30, 2004

Evidence of Pentagon Psychological Warfare Operations Against U.S. Citizens Surfaces in Want Ads
By Justin Rood, CQ Staff

The U.S. military’s domestic operations command says it is not planning or conducting a secret psychological warfare campaign to manipulate the opinions of American citizens, despite a U.S. Air Force document suggesting such activities might be taking place.

“We do not do information operations against the American public,” said Lt. Cmdr. Sean Kelly, a spokesman for the Pentagon’s Northern Command, known as NORTHCOM, based in Colorado Springs, Colo.

Kelly confirmed that there is a “psyops,” or psychological warfare operations, unit at NORTHCOM but said its work is “designed to influence and deter foreign enemies from attacking the United States.”

NORTHCOM was created after the 9/11 attacks to direct military operations, including intelligence analysis, air defense and support for civilian first responders, inside the United States. It shares the military’s counterterrorism mission with the Pentagon’s Pacific Command, Central Command and Strategic Command.

The possibility of a propaganda program run out of the military’s domestic headquarters surfaced with a phrase in an online employment ad.

An advertisement for an “influence operations specialist” with a Top Secret security clearance for the U.S. Air Force appeared on the Web sites of military contractors several weeks ago.

The position would “coordinate [Air Force] inputs to NORAD-NORTHCOM influence operations,” according to the ad. It defined those operations to include “PSYOPS themes and messages for use in foreign countries, public affairs themes and messages,” as well as “deception plans.”

The same position and job description is included in Air Force contracting documents.

At first, NORTHCOM refused to discuss the existence of any such operations.

“It’s illegal to do psyops in the United States, and we don’t talk about it,” was all NORTHCOM’s Kelly would say when asked to confirm or deny that his center was involved in psychological operations. He asked to see copies of the Air Force documents.

NORTHCOM officials waited several days before commenting further. Eventually, they said that the details of the job description by the Air Force relating to NORTHCOM were erroneous.

“Psyops is an operational issue, and I can’t discuss that,” Kelly said at first. Asked later if NORTHCOM’s psyops center coordinated with its public affairs office, he said, “Trust me, there’s nobody from psyops here in my office.

“We may say the similar thing — you know, ‘The sky is blue’ — but we don’t coordinate with each other,” he added. “Psyops doesn’t come in here and say, ‘What are you saying today?’ ”

Later, however, Kelly seemed to indicate there was a modicum of coordination between the two offices.

“There’s coordination where they might say, ‘Hey guys, we’re doing this,’ and if it’s illegal it’ll be stopped,” the spokesman said. Later, he reiterated that there was no coordination between the two, and then said that that was actually a “general rule,” and that “here at NORTHCOM, there shouldn’t be any exception to the general rule.”

Regarding the job description, Kelly said that there is no division called “influence operations” at NORTHCOM, and that, as he put it, “in this case, ‘influence’ is probably the wrong word.”

U.S. Army Role

One section of the Air Force job description said the influence operations specialist was to coordinate with the Army’s 4th Psychological Operations Group (POG), as well as with NORTHCOM public affairs, “deception planners” and other agencies.

Kelly said that language was only a “laundry list” of possible contacts the position might involve and meant only to prevent a future employee from balking and saying, “That’s not in my job description.”

“They threw out — that’s a laundry list,” Kelly said. “When you write a job contract, you want to throw in as much as possible of who they’re going to talk to. . . . People say, ‘That’s not in my job description,’ [so] it covers the blanket.”

Kelly said the influence operations specialist might well interact with the Army’s 4th POG, a normally secretive unit that drew attention in 2000 when it was reported that it had made arrangements with CNN and NPR to send them interns to learn the news business.

“[The job description] throws them in because, in theory, a part of information operations can deal with psyops,” the spokesman said.

As for why an influence operations specialist would need to coordinate with NORTHCOM’s public affairs office, Kelly said: “Because if something’s going on we need to know about, we can get the word out to the press.

“It says who they may be working with, but not how,” Kelly pointed out. “There may be a major network attack going on, and we need to get the word out.”

The Pentagon’s recent history with so-called influence operations has been rocky.

In February 2002, The New York Times reported that the Pentagon had created an Office of Strategic Influence to “[develop] plans to provide news items, possibly even false ones, to foreign media organizations,” to influence the public and leadership of both enemy and allied countries.

Four days later, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said he shut down the office.

In December 2002, Rumsfeld reportedly considered issuing a directive on information warfare that would allow the military to conduct covert operations aimed at influencing opinion in friendly and neutral countries.

That directive, entitled “Directive 3600.1: Information Operations,” is still in draft stage, according to Pentagon sources.

SAIC a Player

Last autumn, the Pentagon awarded a $300,000 contract to Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) to design an “effective strategic influence” campaign to combat global terror.

SAIC is one of the competitors for the Air Force contract that includes the influence operations specialist position. The company would not comment on the contract or the position. Nor would Titan Corp., another competitor for the contract.

To Richard Shiffrin, the Pentagon’s former deputy general counsel for intelligence, the situation “seems strange.”

“Anything that would affect Americans, Congress, the United States — we’re very careful about that,” said Shiffrin, now a consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton.

However, he said, “one of the difficulties with this over the years has been distinguishing between public affairs and influence operations. The line isn’t so bright.”



Last Edit by Gladstone
 

 

Powered by EzPortal