You are Here:

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Financial Crisis Forum / Re: Venezuela closes borders
« Last post by Al Bundy on Today at 02:25:57 pm »


RT - Russia Today


Venezuela closes border with Brazil, may do the same at Colombia border – Maduro
http://www.rt.com/news/452105-venezuela-border-brazil-colombia/





'Starting Thursday evening, Venezuela is closing its border with Brazil, President Nicolas Maduro has announced. He added the same measure may apply to the border with Colombia, though he does not want to order it.

The Venezuelan military was ordered to enforce the travel ban in airspace and on the sea until further notice, Maduro said during a televised address from a military headquarters.

Speaking about possible cut of border travel with Colombia, Maduro said he didn’t want to take such a decision but was considering it.

Both Brazil and Colombia serve as transit counties for Venezuela-bound American shipments. The restrictions come amid a tense stand-off over US attempts to deliver what Washington describes as humanitarian aid into Venezuela in defiance of the wishes of its government. The US considers Maduro usurper and recognizes as the head of state the self-proclaimed acting president Juan Guaido, whose opposition group is the designated receiver of the ‘aid’.

Earlier on Thursday Guaido said he will personally go to the border with Colombia to get the shipment from the US, urging drivers to go with him and defy the border guards ordered to prevent the delivery.

Maduro’s government is suspicious of the US stated plan to provide humanitarian assistance to Venezuelan opposition. US envoy for Venezuela Elliott Abrams has a record of using humanitarian convoys to smuggle arms to Latin American countries targeted for regime change by Washington, and Caracas says he is now trying to follow the same script in Venezuela.'



Read More : Venezuela closes border with Brazil, may do the same at Colombia border – Maduro



Icke





Last Edit by Palmerston

President of Venezula order close border with Cocainombia also.



Last Edit by Palmerston
2
101% pure illuminati whore



Last Edit by Palmerston

Illuminati ? She is satanist. Angelina Jolie is loyal to NWO. She was in Srerbrenica to respect Muslim victims of Serbs.  >:(

P.S. If you can make video clip of her interview in Belgrade. I think will be interesting ( on English ).



Last Edit by Palmerston
3
Why Eve Fischer defend David Icke. Because Fischer realize that Icke is not Anti-Semit, Neo-Nazi, Holocaust denial...Icke is against " Israeli license to kill" ( I forget license to rigged Eurovision last year...).



Last Edit by Palmerston

One thing to remember, is that the vast majority of Zionists are Christians and nothing what so ever to do with Israel.

Nobody talks about this aspect.

Its also true that Nazis whine on about Zionists, as a sneaky way to avoid being called out as anti-semetic, so it is not a simple issue.



Last Edit by Palmerston
4
Good thread  :)


101% pure illuminati whore



Last Edit by Palmerston
5
Good thread  :)

Witch gave order from Washington to make movie in witch Bosnian Serbs whole war rape Bosnian Muslims and do other war crimes:











Even journalist ( who watched the her movie ) and then work on Soros`s TV B92 ask A. Jolie that movie is not quite objective.  ::)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0LEXEL8ivs&t=344s


FoNet | April 01, 2012.

Immediately at the beginning of the film, the transparency was widespread, and the activists of the Patriotic Association Russian Obraz exclaimed "Stop killing Serbs", "Stop the lies", "Serbs - brothers" and "Bosnia - Serbian country".

They interrupted the screening of Angelina Jolie's film "In the Land of Blood and Honey" at the Rolan Cinema in Moscow.

The movie Angelina Jolie has experienced a real debacle in Russia. At the premiere that was held on Saturday in the same cinema, there were 15 people. During the action Russian Obraz in the hall there were 13 people.

The projection is stopped, and the lights are lit in the room. All presenters were given a leaflet explaining that the film is propaganda against the Serbs in Bosnia and spread the lies ...

http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/spektakl.147.html:373485-Moskva-Prekinut-film-Andjeline-Dzoli



Last Edit by Palmerston
6


evefisher.com
http://www.evefisher.com/



Jewish Australian journalist defends David Icke (she's actually read his books) but no media outlet will run it - not Murdoch's rabble, not Fairfax, not the Guardian. Excellent article
http://evefisher.com/2019/02/22/if-you-think-were-free-think-again/





'Media outlets won’t touch this piece. One major group said there wasn’t enough room to run it … online! Another said it was “too polemic”. I’ll take that thanks very much…

Ask yourself this simple question. It needs just a yay or nay, with no middle ground. Do you believe in freedom of speech? No shades of grey. You either believe in it. Or you don’t. No picking and choosing about who gets to employ it, and who doesn’t. One in, all in. Unless you’re in China of course, or Russia.

And, so it would seem, Australia.

Freedom of speech is fundamental to … well, our freedom. Funny isn’t it. We take it for granted in these days of over-sharing until we say something inflammatory. Some keyboard warriors give us a lashing and send us to our corner. But we don’t have our tongues cut out.

We take it for granted that we can say what we like, as long as we are not encouraging people to hurt others, or, indeed, themselves. Inciting violence is not the same as enjoying freedom of speech. Being hateful is also not inciting violence; it’s being nasty. There’s a difference and knowing this difference is the defining line between those who believe in the fundamental tenets of freedom of speech and those who believe in it as long as it suits their politically correct, pandering agenda.

This week, Immigration Minister David Coleman couldn’t have played a more honest hand if he tried. I’ll give him that. His cancellation of leading conspiracy researcher David Icke’s visa just hours before he was due to fly to Australia was as swift as it was malicious. There was no warning – despite the speaking-tour visa being approved in September – and its timing was obviously designed to cause maximum disruption to Icke.'



Read More : Jewish Australian journalist defends David Icke (she's actually read his books) but no media outlet will run it - not Murdoch's rabble, not Fairfax, not the Guardian. Excellent article



Icke





Last Edit by Palmerston

Why Eve Fischer defend David Icke. Because Fischer realize that Icke is not Anti-Semit, Neo-Nazi, Holocaust denial...Icke is against " Israeli license to kill" ( I forget license to rigged Eurovision last year...).



Last Edit by Palmerston
7
Financial Crisis Forum / Venezuela – US Attack Imminent?
« Last post by David Icke Bot on Today at 06:58:11 am »


Global Research CA


Venezuela – US Attack Imminent?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/venezuela-us-attack-imminent/5669311





'Imagine, the President of the self-declared, exceptional and unique Superpower, Donald Trump of the United States of America, has the audacity to threaten the Venezuelan military with their lives, if they keep standing behind the democratically elected President Nicolás Maduro, and defending his Government. An open threat – yesterday, 18 February, at a Miami University, in a speech of ‘fire and fury’; this time against socialist Venezuela with which he wants to finish, like with all other socialist nations – especially those in his ‘backyard’. So, Cuba, Nicaragua and Bolivia are next in Trump’s crosshairs – and / or the crosshairs of his handlers. Don’t forget, he is a staged and convenient fool for the “Deep State” or the “Profound Government” – whatever you want to call this secret clan of the Chosen People that intends to rule the world. I cannot help being amazed at what level of inhumanity we have arrived. Trump calls openly out to assassinate those who stand behind the legitimate President of Venezuela – and the rest of the world just looks on, watches and says NOTHING – zilch, zero – tolerates such atrocity coming from the mouth of a buffoon, aka the strongman of the self-proclaimed one and only superpower of the globe. – No, much worse – the so-called civilized west, the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan – and some second- and third class puppet developing countries from South America, whose people are being starved while the elite admires and dances to the tune of the USA; united in what they call the “Group of Lima” (created in Lima in August 2017, to “safe” Venezuela). Members include, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay and Peru.

In the meantime, Mexico, under her new leftwing President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, or simply, AMLO, abstains from any decision against Venezuela. To the contrary, Mexico is part of the “Montevideo Mechanism” that comprises Mexico, Uruguay, Bolivia and the member countries of CARICOM and seeks conflict resolution through dialogue with the opposition, for which the Maduro Government has been ready from the beginning of the conflict, but which has been boycotted by the opposition, as were the 20 May 2018 elections which the non-participating opposition now calls a fraud.'



Read More : Venezuela – US Attack Imminent?



Icke





Last Edit by Palmerston
8


Media Big Lies About Putin’s Federal Assembly Address






Western major media, especially in the US, are a collective lying machine on issues mattering most, notably geopolitical ones, especially anything about Russia.

A separate article discussed Vladimir Putin’s Wednesday Federal Assembly address, the equivalent of the US president’s SOTU - his remarks polar opposite Trump’s bombast, bravado and Big Lies.

It’s how he always trumpets publicly (pun intended), Big Lies, deception, and gross exaggeration featured over truth-telling - why most everything he says lacks credibility.

In his Wednesday address, Putin explained that hostile US actions forced Russia to respond defensively, developing, producing, and deploying super-weapons exceeding the Pentagon’s best.

They’re not for use against another nation preemptively, he stressed, only to defend the Russian Federation effectively if attacked by an aggressor - Washington the key threat to Russia’s security.

US establishment media responded to Putin’s address with a litany of bald-faced Big Lies, part of their longstanding Russia bashing agenda for reasons I explained many times before - mainly its sovereign independence, Washington’s key target for regime change.
The NYT

Putin clearly said Russia threatens no other nations. It has no intention to attack any preemptively, proved by its actions.

Its super and other weapons are solely for defense - not offense the way the US operates, waging endless wars of aggression against one nation after another, what the Times and other US media never explain, supporting what demands denunciation.

The Times: On Wednesday, “Putin made some of his most explicit threats ever” - a bald-faced Big Lie.

The Times: “His aggressive tone (sic) appeared to be intended, in part, to persuade Washington not to abandon the (INF) treaty.”

His Wednesday remarks and others on geopolitical issues are consistently moderate to a fault. They lack toughness when needed, the only language the US understands, moderation seen as weakness.

The neocon/CIA-connected <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/putin-warns-new-weapons-will-target-us-if-missiles-are-deployed-in-europe/2019/02/20/62d0456e-3468-11e9-8375-e3dcf6b68558_story.html?utm_term=.800a69c411c6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Washington Post[/url] repeated the same Big Lies about Putin’s address, saying “his remarks were among the strongest yet on a potential new arms race after the countries’ mutual pullout (sic) from a Cold War-era nuclear weapons treaty” - referring to the INF Treaty, disparaging the landmark treaty. No “mutual pullout” occurred. The Trump regime preemptively withdrew from the 1987 agreement, forcing Russia to react defensively, its only option.

WaPo: “Nuclear saber-rattling has become key to the Kremlin’s projection of power both at home and abroad, and could be an attempt to bring Washington to the negotiating table.”

Saber-rattling and naked aggression reflect how Washington operates, not Russia - at war with no other country. The US wages endless wars against nations threatening no one.

The Trump regime, WaPo, and other US establishment media falsely claimed Russian INF Treaty violations. Not a shred of credible evidence suggests it.

The <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/putin-ratchets-up-nuclear-warning-against-u-s-11550668465" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wall Street Journal[/url] turned truth on its head, accusing Putin of “ratchet(ing) up (a) nuclear warning against the US,” adding:

“Russia…suspend(ed) its obligations under the INF treaty…in response to Washington’s plans to abandon the pact in six months if Moscow doesn’t destroy missile systems the US says are in breach of the agreement.”

The Trump regime lied about Russian missiles, the Journal failed to explain - nor that the US alone is a serial treaty violator.

According to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, “publicly available information makes it clear that the US Aegis-based systems in Eastern Europe, if equipped with cruise missiles, would indeed violate the INF,” adding:

“If the Aegis-based systems in Eastern Europe were supplied with American cruise missiles — either the existing Tomahawk or a new missile that Russia claims the United States has been developing — they would become fearsome offensive forces, staged on the frontiers of Russia.”

“And there would be little way for Russia to know whether Aegis systems were loaded with missile defense interceptors or nuclear-armed cruise missiles.”

The Journal, WaPo, the Times, and other US major media failed to report the above assessment, along with not explaining that no credible evidence suggests Russia violated the INF Treaty.

The Journal instead called Putin’s straight forward talk “tough.” It was moderate, far short of needed toughness in dealing the the US.

As explained in the same day article on this issue, decades after the 1962 missiles of October crisis, world tensions are heightened over the Trump regime’s INF Treaty pullout and likely deployment of nuclear capable short and/or intermediate-range missiles in Eastern Europe close to Russia’s border - forcing the Kremlin to respond defensively, increasing the risk of nuclear war.

Russia is falsely blamed for hostile US actions. The imperial agenda pursued by Republicans and undemocratic Dems threatens world peace, stability and security.

US major media are silent on the most important issue of our time - along with supporting US aggression instead of denouncing it.

VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: <a href="http://stephenlendman.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">stephenlendman.org[/url] (<a href="http://stephenlendman.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Home - Stephen Lendman[/url]). Contact at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6dad3d8d2dbd7d8c5c2d3c6ded3d8f6c5d4d5d1dad9d4d7da98d8d3c2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d31383339303c332e29382d35383 31d2e3f3e3a31323f3c3173333829 ">[email protected]</span>[/url].

My newest book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."
https://claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html


Icke





Last Edit by Palmerston
9


evefisher.com
http://www.evefisher.com/



Jewish Australian journalist defends David Icke (she's actually read his books) but no media outlet will run it - not Murdoch's rabble, not Fairfax, not the Guardian. Excellent article
http://evefisher.com/2019/02/22/if-you-think-were-free-think-again/





'Media outlets won’t touch this piece. One major group said there wasn’t enough room to run it … online! Another said it was “too polemic”. I’ll take that thanks very much…

Ask yourself this simple question. It needs just a yay or nay, with no middle ground. Do you believe in freedom of speech? No shades of grey. You either believe in it. Or you don’t. No picking and choosing about who gets to employ it, and who doesn’t. One in, all in. Unless you’re in China of course, or Russia.

And, so it would seem, Australia.

Freedom of speech is fundamental to … well, our freedom. Funny isn’t it. We take it for granted in these days of over-sharing until we say something inflammatory. Some keyboard warriors give us a lashing and send us to our corner. But we don’t have our tongues cut out.

We take it for granted that we can say what we like, as long as we are not encouraging people to hurt others, or, indeed, themselves. Inciting violence is not the same as enjoying freedom of speech. Being hateful is also not inciting violence; it’s being nasty. There’s a difference and knowing this difference is the defining line between those who believe in the fundamental tenets of freedom of speech and those who believe in it as long as it suits their politically correct, pandering agenda.

This week, Immigration Minister David Coleman couldn’t have played a more honest hand if he tried. I’ll give him that. His cancellation of leading conspiracy researcher David Icke’s visa just hours before he was due to fly to Australia was as swift as it was malicious. There was no warning – despite the speaking-tour visa being approved in September – and its timing was obviously designed to cause maximum disruption to Icke.'



Read More : Jewish Australian journalist defends David Icke (she's actually read his books) but no media outlet will run it - not Murdoch's rabble, not Fairfax, not the Guardian. Excellent article



Icke





Last Edit by Palmerston
10


BoingBoing.net
http://BoingBoing.net/


Murdoch shock: Climate change denier allowed to visit Australia
http://boingboing.net/2015/09/09/rupert-murdoch-just-bought-nat.html





The National Geographic magazine has been a nonprofit publication since inception in 1888, but that ends today. The long-running American publication becomes very much for-profit under a $725 million dollar deal announced today with 21st Century Fox, the entertainment company controlled by the family of Rupert Murdoch.

Murdoch is a notorious climate change denier, and his family's Fox media empire is the world's primary source of global warming misinformation. Which would be no big deal here, I guess, were it not for the fact that the National Geographic Society's mission includes giving grants to scientists.

From today's deal coverage in WaPo:

The partnership, which will also include the National Geographic cable channel and the National Geographic Society’s other media assets, will be called National Geographic Partners. Fox will own 73 percent of the partnership, and Washington-based National Geographic Society will own the balance. Fox will pay $725 million to the Society for its stake in the partnership. This will push the Society’s endowment to more than $1 billion.

Let the “National Geographic Covers Designed by Rupert Murdoch” Photoshop Wars begin.



Read More : Murdoch shock: Climate change denier allowed to visit Australia



Icke





Last Edit by Palmerston
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by EzPortal