You are Here:
Sorry Guest, you are banned from posting and sending personal messages on this forum.
Host Name Bans (EG)
This ban is not set to expire.
The Vaccine Agenda

Author (Read 39 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The Vaccine Agenda
« on: Nov 12, 2017, 11:05:48 am »
 

#1 Trouble Maker

  • Awake
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *
  • 664
    Posts
Harvard Immunologist: "Unvaccinated Vaccine Free Children Pose ZERO Risk to Anyone and Here’s Why'


As this immunologist points out, not only are vaccines themselves completely useless but if you read between the lines and connect the dots vaccines really have very little to do with actually preventing disease.  Why do the Malthus worshiping eugenics pushing globalists HISTORICALLY love injecting the population with their crap?

http://truthstreammedia.com/2017/11/08/harvard-immunologist-unvaccinated-children-pose-zero-risk-anyone-heres/

Nov 8, 2017
TSM
Dear Legislator:

My name is Tetyana Obukhanych. I hold a PhD in Immunology. I am writing this letter in the hope that it will correct several common misperceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings.

Do unvaccinated children pose a higher threat to the public than the vaccinated?

It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide. You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern vaccines – and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children – is not consistent with such a statement. I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases. People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public school setting may not be warranted.

IPV (inactivated poliovirus vaccine) cannot prevent transmission of poliovirus. Wild poliovirus has been non-existent in the USA for at least two decades. Even if wild poliovirus were to be re-imported by travel, vaccinating for polio with IPV cannot affect the safety of public spaces. Please note that wild poliovirus eradication is attributed to the use of a different vaccine, OPV or oral poliovirus vaccine. Despite being capable of preventing wild poliovirus transmission, use of OPV was phased out long ago in the USA and replaced with IPV due to safety concerns.

Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C. tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is intended to render personal protection only.

While intended to prevent the disease-causing effects of the diphtheria toxin, the diphtheria toxoid vaccine (also contained in the DTaP vaccine) is not designed to prevent colonization and transmission of C. diphtheriae. Vaccinating for diphtheria cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is likewise intended for personal protection only.

The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA, replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable of preventing colonization and transmission of B. pertussis. The FDA has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.

Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters, meaning that people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.

Among numerous types of H. influenzae, the Hib vaccine covers only type b. Despite its sole intention to reduce symptomatic and asymptomatic (disease-less) Hib carriage, the introduction of the Hib vaccine has inadvertently shifted strain dominance towards other types of H. influenzae (types a through f).These types have been causing invasive disease of high severity and increasing incidence in adults in the era of Hib vaccination of children. The general population is more vulnerable to the invasive disease now than it was prior to the start of the Hib vaccination campaign. Discriminating against children who are not vaccinated for Hib does not make any scientific sense in the era of non-type b H. influenzae disease.

Hepatitis B is a blood-borne virus. It does not spread in a community setting, especially among children who are unlikely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as needle sharing or sex. Vaccinating children for hepatitis B cannot significantly alter the safety of public spaces. Further, school admission is not prohibited for children who are chronic hepatitis B carriers. To prohibit school admission for those who are simply unvaccinated – and do not even carry hepatitis B – would constitute unreasonable and illogical discrimination.

In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is. No discrimination is warranted.

How often do serious vaccine adverse events happen?

It is often stated that vaccination rarely leads to serious adverse events. Unfortunately, this statement is not supported by science. A recent study done in Ontario, Canada, established that vaccination actually leads to an emergency room visit for 1 in 168 children following their 12-month vaccination appointment and for 1 in 730 children following their 18-month vaccination appointment.

When the risk of an adverse event requiring an ER visit after well-baby vaccinations is demonstrably so high, vaccination must remain a choice for parents, who may understandably be unwilling to assume this immediate risk in order to protect their children from diseases that are generally considered mild or that their children may never be exposed to.

Can discrimination against families who oppose vaccines for reasons of conscience prevent future disease outbreaks of communicable viral diseases, such as measles?

Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the “measles paradox.” I quote from the article by Poland & Jacobson (1994) “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.” Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:

“The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.”

Further research determined that behind the “measles paradox” is a fraction of the population called low vaccine responders. Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine. These individuals then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of “susceptibles’’ within 2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated.

Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait. The proportion of low-responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA.

Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%). This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time. Vaccine immunity does not equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.

It has been documented that vaccinated persons who develop breakthrough measles are contagious. In fact, two major measles outbreaks in 2011 (in Quebec, Canada, and in New York, NY) were re-imported by previously vaccinated individuals.

Taken together, these data make it apparent that elimination of vaccine exemptions, currently only utilized by a small percentage of families anyway, will neither solve the problem of disease resurgence nor prevent re-importation and outbreaks of previously eliminated diseases.

Is discrimination against conscientious vaccine objectors the only practical solution?

The majority of measles cases in recent US outbreaks (including the recent Disneyland outbreak) are adults and very young babies, whereas in the pre-vaccination era, measles occurred mainly between the ages 1 and 15. Natural exposure to measles was followed by lifelong immunity from re-infection, whereas vaccine immunity wanes over time, leaving adults unprotected by their childhood shots. Measles is more dangerous for infants and for adults than for school-aged children.

Despite high chances of exposure in the pre-vaccination era, measles practically never happened in babies much younger than one year of age due to the robust maternal immunity transfer mechanism. The vulnerability of very young babies to measles today is the direct outcome of the prolonged mass vaccination campaign of the past, during which their mothers, themselves vaccinated in their childhood, were not able to experience measles naturally at a safe school age and establish the lifelong immunity that would also be transferred to their babies and protect them from measles for the first year of life.

Luckily, a therapeutic backup exists to mimic now-eroded maternal immunity. Infants as well as other vulnerable or immunocompromised individuals, are eligible to receive immunoglobulin, a potentially life-saving measure that supplies antibodies directed against the virus to prevent or ameliorate disease upon exposure.

In summary: 1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals pose no greater risk of transmission of polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-vaccinated individuals pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is not transmissible at all; 2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits after childhood vaccination appointments attesting that vaccination is not risk-free; 3) outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had nearly perfect vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral diseases in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is available for those who may be exposed to these diseases.

Taken together, these four facts make it clear that discrimination in a public school setting against children who are not vaccinated for reasons of conscience is completely unwarranted as the vaccine status of conscientious objectors poses no undue public health risk.

Sincerely Yours,

~ Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD













Last Edit by Palmerston
 

Re: The Vaccine Agenda
« Reply #1 on: Nov 18, 2017, 09:54:26 pm »
 

#1 Trouble Maker

  • Awake
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *
  • 664
    Posts
Vaccine White Papers... Aluminum & The Autism Connection
http://www.icandecide.com/white-papers/ICAN-AluminumAdjuvant-Autism.pdf

The white paper also explains why the New World Order globalists insist pregnant women get injected with the extra high heavy metal flu shot.  Medical research shows that when a woman's immune system is 'over stimulated' by activation, the child has an equally high probability that it will be "BORN" autistic AKA heavy metal poison.

The globalists have to go after the woman's fetus,  Because too many parents are waking up to the fact that the vaccines are the #1 reason why their PERFECTLY NORMAL 18 month old all of the sudden becomes near brain dead after the third round of toxic ridden vaccines.

If the globalists can cause brain damage to the fetus AKA Autism then of course it's the blame of the mother and father's bad genes.

The white paper explains why heavy metals cause autism spectrum symptoms.  This would include heavy metals like mercury and lead as well.



Last Edit by Palmerston
 

Re: The Vaccine Agenda
« Reply #2 on: Nov 18, 2017, 10:01:38 pm »
 

#1 Trouble Maker

  • Awake
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *
  • 664
    Posts
The Truth About Vaccines Episode 1












Last Edit by Palmerston
 

Re: The Vaccine Agenda
« Reply #3 on: Today at 02:08:34 am »
 

Effie Trinket

  • InfoWarrior
  • ***
  • 154
    Posts
Vaccine White Papers... Aluminum & The Autism Connection
http://www.icandecide.com/white-papers/ICAN-AluminumAdjuvant-Autism.pdf

The white paper also explains why the New World Order globalists insist pregnant women get injected with the extra high heavy metal flu shot.  Medical research shows that when a woman's immune system is 'over stimulated' by activation, the child has an equally high probability that it will be "BORN" autistic AKA heavy metal poison.

The globalists have to go after the woman's fetus,  Because too many parents are waking up to the fact that the vaccines are the #1 reason why their PERFECTLY NORMAL 18 month old all of the sudden becomes near brain dead after the third round of toxic ridden vaccines.

If the globalists can cause brain damage to the fetus AKA Autism then of course it's the blame of the mother and father's bad genes.

The white paper explains why heavy metals cause autism spectrum symptoms.  This would include heavy metals like mercury and lead as well.



Last Edit by Palmerston
This really shows how evil these guys are, they have, and are literally attacking the most fundamental aspects of humanity, the foundations of creation itself, attempting to usurp God's work by attacking, corrupting, and destroying things right at the most base, foundational levels.  Just one semantical thing you need to keep in mind however--Aluminum, while extremely toxic, itself is not a heavy metal, as you know in fact it is one of the lightest metals.  It's important to be perfectly accurate when talking about things like this because TPTB will grab ANYTHING even slightly off that you say and will incessantly use that to try to discredit you by making you look stupid to other people.  It is better to be ignored for telling the absolute truth than to be ridiculed for telling 99.9% truth because you didn't realize 0.1% of what you said was unintentionally incorrect.

That aside, I'm sure there are many things regarding Al that I am not even aware of myself that make it dangerous, but one thing I do know is that it has a huge, synergistically destructive effect in conjunction with Fluoride, increasing the absorption of Flouride into your body by a factor of around 600 times greater.  And, they know this full well.  Oh and it's no coincidence that the new and devastating forms of electromagnetic radiation they're intentionally vastly expanding and surrounding us with has an incredibly unbelievable "you cannot make this shit up" characteristic.  Pulsed EMF's make the blood-brain barrier permeable all by themselves, which is a completely different avenue in which the globalists can ensure they get their biological slow extermination poisons to destroy your body and mind.  It's not enough that vaccines all by themselves are literally assassinating your bloodstream (and organs, cells, et.al.) but they need to also be made even more devastating by using Eugenics ("smart") meter Zigbee wifi/pulsed EMF, and the total extermination agenda of 5G.  Oh and don't forget how geoengineering also helps destroy everyone's health.  5 ways to kill you isn't enough, they want dozens, hundreds, because YOU (we) are not dying fast enough as far as they are concerned, and how 'DARE YOU' try to protect yourself from their full spectrum, viscous, psychopathic assault on your bodily systems.



Last Edit by Palmerston
 

 

Powered by EzPortal