Global Gulag Media Forum

ELECTIONS + POLITICS => U.S. Elections => Election 2020 => Topic started by: EvadingGrid on Jan 22, 2019, 12:02:22 pm

Title: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Jan 22, 2019, 12:02:22 pm
Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?

Polls : Cortez 40% Trump 43%

Yup, she can almost beat Trump and she has yet to complete her first month in office. Now you know why Trumpbots have her, not Killary as No.1 Target.



Alex Jones is calling her a Meth-Head, Crack Whore and other absolute bollox.













Last Edit by Larry
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Jan 22, 2019, 01:15:23 pm
Yep. Beto O'Rourke as well. Someone newer on the national scene and younger. Worked like a charm with Obama. Getting easier by the day. There's only one way to ensure a victory for the republicans... (large false flag 'n thousands dead 'n jets 'n splosions)



Last Edit by Larry
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: Al Bundy on Jan 22, 2019, 04:08:27 pm
Joseph Biden.



Last Edit by Palmerston

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-04/donald-trump-challengers-in-2020-us-presidential-election/10678614



Last Edit by Palmerston

Latino could be nominee for Vice-president.



Last Edit by Larry
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Jan 22, 2019, 04:47:14 pm
Any red flags of the illuminati in her wiki-bio ?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez



Last Edit by Larry
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: NMTO on Jan 22, 2019, 05:33:56 pm
Any red flags of the illuminati in her wiki-bio ?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez



Last Edit by Palmerston

She is not old enough to run...



Last Edit by Larry
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Jan 22, 2019, 05:42:05 pm
She is not old enough to run...

Good to know. I think she'd be less likely to win than the others mentioned here anyway. Too blatantly socialist. For 2020. Given enough time and public education though... Yea Biden, forgot about him. Also the Colorado governor We Are Change found at Bilderberg last year. John Hickenlooper.

I got to see a lot of Beto O'Rourke last year. Reeked of Obamaness. He said a bunch of nothing that sounded good and like something.



Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Jan 22, 2019, 06:03:18 pm
Any red flags of the illuminati in her wiki-bio ?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez

Gets an op-ed published in a Jesuit magazine one day after her primary win? Hmm... Update: Read it. Nothin much. But it's pretty strange to me she gets published as people are waking up to hear her name for the first time. Maybe she had submitted it earlier? Idk

https://americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/06/27/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-her-catholic-faith-and-urgency-criminal



Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Jan 22, 2019, 06:09:13 pm
She is not old enough to run...



Last Edit by Palmerston

Just one of the all time great politicians.

William Pitt the Younger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Pitt_the_Younger

Youngest British prime minister in 1783 at the age of 24



Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Jan 22, 2019, 06:11:19 pm
Gets an op-ed published in a Jesuit magazine one day after her primary win? Hmm... Haven't read it yet...

https://americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/06/27/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-her-catholic-faith-and-urgency-criminal



Last Edit by Palmerston

Yup...

Also part of her heritage is sephadic ethnic jew, as opposed to the ashkenhazi of unknown eastern europe.


I still no nothing about her, so I have no idea if she would be better or worse than Trump.
Perhaps by 2020 the real decider will be Trump Fatigue . . . As in, people will have had to much exposure to his brand, and over exposure becomes completely toxic.

Still, looking on the brightside, she is giving the Trumpbots a real fright.




Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Jan 22, 2019, 06:20:56 pm
Yup...

Also part of her heritage is sephadic ethnic jew, as opposed to the ashkenhazi of unknown eastern europe.


I still no nothing about her, so I have no idea if she would be better or worse than Trump.
Perhaps by 2020 the real decider will be Trump Fatigue . . . As in, people will have had to much exposure to his brand, and over exposure becomes completely toxic.

Still, looking on the brightside, she is giving the Trumpbots a real fright.




Last Edit by Palmerston

She's a self proclaimed socialist. Completely unamerican. The product of what the universities (that need to be completely crushed) are pumping out today. But she hasn't been told yet that you're not really supposed to say it so loud and proud. Or that the Republicans are about half as socialist as she is anyway.

Forget Trump. She is our future if we don't fix and stop supporting certain things. 70% tax lol just make it 99%



Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Jan 22, 2019, 06:34:48 pm
She's a self proclaimed socialist. Completely unamerican. The product of what the universities (that need to be completely crushed) are pumping out today. But she hasn't been told yet that you're not really supposed to say it so loud and proud. Or that the Republicans are about half as socialist as she is anyway.

Forget Trump. She is our future if we don't fix and stop supporting certain things. 70% tax lol just make it 99%



Last Edit by Palmerston

I'd worry more about being forced into a cashless society and the new world order.

Because who ever gets the seat in the oval office, its the illuminati who get 'elected' as rulers of Empire.

I'm still amused at the over the top phreaked out reaction of the likes of Alex Jones.
Its funny.





Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Jan 22, 2019, 07:12:49 pm
I'd worry more about being forced into a cashless society and the new world order.

Because who ever gets the seat in the oval office, its the illuminati who get 'elected' as rulers of Empire.

I'm still amused at the over the top phreaked out reaction of the likes of Alex Jones.
Its funny.

Yea, that's why Hickenlooper at Bilderberg was interesting, think the spread of marijuana legalization. Did you see the Healthwyze video on it after the election? Idk if it really had that much of an impact, but it is certainly a big part of why the Republicans lost the House. No doubt.

What you were saying before about Jones sounded pretty ridiculous. I can't stand listening to him at all anymore. Only the doap video memes people put together lol

I have more respect for Clyde Lewis now, and half of what he does is complete paranormal bullshit, but I feel like he gets to slip in more unbiased truth from time to time. Unfortunately, Jones has been slipping into his show. Although, I have to say, when he's on Lewis' show he sounds more like his old self. Bah whatevs, we should have a thread specifically on 2020 candidates though.



Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Jan 22, 2019, 08:01:47 pm
Yea, that's why Hickenlooper at Bilderberg was interesting, think the spread of marijuana legalization. Did you see the Healthwyze video on it after the election? Idk if it really had that much of an impact, but it is certainly a big part of why the Republicans lost the House. No doubt.

What you were saying before about Jones sounded pretty ridiculous. I can't stand listening to him at all anymore. Only the doap video memes people put together lol

I have more respect for Clyde Lewis now, and half of what he does is complete paranormal bullshit, but I feel like he gets to slip in more unbiased truth from time to time. Unfortunately, Jones has been slipping into his show. Although, I have to say, when he's on Lewis' show he sounds more like his old self. Bah whatevs, we should have a thread specifically on 2020 candidates though.



Last Edit by Palmerston

I can have a go tomorrow at splitting these posts and putting them together on the Election 2020 Board (http://forum.globalgulag.com/index.php?board=126.0)




Last Edit by Palmerston
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Jan 23, 2019, 11:25:35 am
I can have a go tomorrow at splitting these posts and putting them together on the Election 2020 Board (http://forum.globalgulag.com/index.php?board=126.0)




Last Edit by Palmerston

Done.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: David Icke Bot on Feb 01, 2019, 06:06:07 am


The 'polar vortex' meets the 'green deal'



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CORTEZ-BOLLOCKS.jpg)













Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/519511/polar-vortex-meets-green-deal)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Feb 01, 2019, 12:22:29 pm
You can add Kamala Harris and Cory Booker as two other globalist lackeys eager to assume the US throne.  I wonder if the elite will decide to have a female be the next US president?



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 01, 2019, 06:31:28 pm
You can add Kamala Harris (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris) and Cory Booker (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cory_Booker) as two other globalist lackeys eager to assume the US throne.  I wonder if the elite will decide to have a female be the next US president?



Last Edit by Palmerston

Have to keep one eye open to see who gets invited to Bilderberg.
:)



Last Edit by Larry
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: David Icke Bot on Feb 02, 2019, 07:31:54 am
You can add Kamala Harris and Cory Booker as two other globalist lackeys eager to assume the US throne.  I wonder if the elite will decide to have a female be the next US president?



Last Edit by Palmerston
.



theguardian.com
http://www.theguardian.com/ (http://theguardian.com/)



Cory Booker announces run for presidency in 2020
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/01/cory-booker-announces-run-for-presidency-in-2020


(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/BOOKER-FUEL-1.jpg)


Senator Cory Booker on Friday morning jumped into the already busy field of Democratic candidates running for the White House in 2020 in a bid to turf out Donald Trump.

The New Jersey senator and former mayor of Newark emailed supporters promising to “channel our common pain back into our common purpose”.

He also issued a video.











Booker said: “The history of our nation is defined by collective action; by interwoven destinies of slaves and abolitionists; of those born here and those who chose America as home; of those who took up arms to defend our country, and those who linked arms to challenge and change it.” Booker, 49, has served in the Senate since 2013. He made his announcement on the first day of February, which is designated Black History Month, a time on the calendar for commemorations and educational programs about significant people and events in the history of the African diaspora.



Ostensibly, the politicians were on hand to celebrate the life and work of the civil rights leader. But for both, it was an opportunity to speak candidly about race to black voters who will play a gigantic role in selecting the Democratic nominee for 2020.'



Read More : Cory Booker announces run for presidency in 2020 (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/01/cory-booker-announces-run-for-presidency-in-2020)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/519642/cory-booker-announces-run-presidency-2020)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: demonization of ‘Kremlin’s crush’ Tulsi Gabbard goes full tilt
Post by: David Icke Bot on Feb 04, 2019, 06:35:28 am
(http://rt.com/static/img/og-logo-rt.png)

RT - Russia Today


As she enters White House race, demonization of ‘Kremlin’s crush’ Tulsi Gabbard goes full tilt
http://www.rt.com/news/450513-tulsi-gabbard-nbc-media-demonization/


(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/TULSI-GABBARD-1.jpg)


'The sky may have been clear in Hawaii when Tulsi Gabbard read her speech promising to fight “greed and corruption,” but she enters her bid under a cloud of negative media coverage and accusations of being Russia's darling.

At first glance Gabbard would seem almost too perfect for the Democratic candidate to face Trump in 2020: a 37-year-old part-Samoan woman, who previously broke off a promising career in local politics to volunteer for combat zone service in Iraq, and is unfailingly popular with voters on her home island. “What our country needs now more than ever is the spirit of Aloha. That spirit of respect and love for one another and for our country,” she said in a launch speech that the 2008 Barack Obama, himself, might have found too idealistically bland.











Hours earlier, in a two-author NBC investigation an entirely different picture had been painted of the “controversial” Gabbard – the centerpoint of “the first stirrings of an upcoming Russian campaign” in which the Kremlin “propaganda machine” would seek to inject pro-Russian positions into the Democratic Party's discussions and debates with help from “inauthentic accounts.”



To understand why Gabbard is not treated as a customary feel-good story of a woman breaking multiple glass ceilings, but as a tool of the Kremlin, several pages of her biography need to be revisited.

The first, her resignation from the senior post of Vice President of the Democratic National Committee in protest at the lack of scheduled debates between frontrunner Hillary Clinton and the rising Bernie Sanders, whom she subsequently went on to endorse.'



Read More : As she enters White House race, demonization of ‘Kremlin’s crush’ Tulsi Gabbard goes full tilt (http://www.rt.com/news/450513-tulsi-gabbard-nbc-media-demonization/)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/520068/enters-white-house-race-demonization-kremlins-crush-tulsi-gabbard-goes-full-tilt)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: David Icke Bot on Feb 05, 2019, 05:45:28 am


thecanary.co
http://www.thecanary.co/ (http://thecanary.co/)



‘Russiagate’ has little to do with Russia. It’s a tool to destroy anti-war resistance
http://www.thecanary.co/us/us-analysis/2019/02/04/russiagate-has-little-to-do-with-russia-its-a-tool-to-destroy-anti-war-resistance/


(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/TULSI-GABBARD-1.jpg)


'In the US, the likelihood of being smeared as a Russian stooge seems to be directly related to the popularity of your anti-war message.

Anti-interventionists who fly too close to political power get scolded by the corporate media, which consistently (and falsely) links them to Vladimir Putin. If Russia also opposes US imperialism, so it goes, you must be with them.

The lack of evidence for Russiagate smears doesn’t matter, though. Because they are of service to the US war machine. And if opposition to US aggression can be written off as a Russian conspiracy, resistance is weakened and the war machine can roll on unaffected.

The latest victim of such Russiagate smears is aspiring presidential candidate and US army veteran Tulsi Gabbard. And the attacks show just how desperate the political and media establishment are getting. <strong>Russiagate</strong>

Demonising Russia is not a new technique. But it’s certainly effective. Throughout the Cold War, the US consistently exaggerated the Soviet threat to justify its own imperialist plundering. And after almost two decades of the ‘war on terror’, the propaganda machine has come full circle.

Today, Gabbard is the latest in a long list of US politicians to face accusations of directly or indirectly doing Russia’s will.

Vanity Fair described anti-war senator Rand Paul, for instance, as “Trump’s perfect Russia stooge” with a “curious affinity for Moscow”. Various commentators have similarly tried to link senator Bernie Sanders and new congress member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to the Kremlin. The Hill bluntly argued that Democratic ties to Russia are ample, and often ethically dubious.'



Read More : ‘Russiagate’ has little to do with Russia. It’s a tool to destroy anti-war resistance (http://www.thecanary.co/us/us-analysis/2019/02/04/russiagate-has-little-to-do-with-russia-its-a-tool-to-destroy-anti-war-resistance/)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/520241/russiagate-little-russia-tool-destroy-anti-war-resistance)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: The ‘shocking details’ of the Green New Deal - AOC
Post by: David Icke Bot on Feb 09, 2019, 07:41:54 am
(http://rt.com/static/img/og-logo-rt.png)

RT - Russia Today


The ‘shocking details’ of the Green New Deal
http://www.rt.com/business/450988-green-new-deal-us/


(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/GREEN-NEW-DEAL.jpg)


The long-awaited Green New Deal was unveiled in Washington on Thursday, laying down a marker for 2020 and beyond.

If you haven’t heard of the Green New Deal, you probably live under a rock. The highly-anticipated policy proposal, spearheaded by freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) and Senator Ed Markey (MA), calls for a World War II-style or Apollo program (pick your historical analogy) mobilization to transition the US economy off of fossil fuels.

The Green New Deal has floated around in the past, particularly during the financial crisis over a decade ago, but was really revived as a major concept by environmental groups and Rep. Ocasio-Cortez in recent months. While any legislation cannot pass the current Congress, given Republican control over the Senate and Donald Trump in the White House, it is now very much a litmus test for aspiring Democratic candidates for president in the 2020 election.

As such, its contents are important, given that one of these candidates could occupy the White House in two years. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Markey finally unveiled a resolution on February 7, sketching out the framework of future legislation. The bill was necessarily done in broad strokes for several reasons. The Democrats have to wait until 2021 at the earliest before trying to pass something. Keeping everyone on board, at this stage, requires some finessing, leaving some difficult decisions for later. And, of course, detailing the nitty gritty of a complete transformation of America’s energy system will take time.

So, what’s in it? The Green New Deal legislation lays out several key principles, calling for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, the creation of millions of jobs through public investment, an overhaul of US infrastructure, clean air and water, and justice for frontline communities during this transition.

More specifically, it calls for a 10-year program of “national mobilization,” which will achieve 100 percent of US power demand from clean, renewable and zero-emissions energy sources. It calls for building energy efficient, distributed, and “smart” power grids. Existing buildings will see an overhaul while new buildings are intended to achieve “maximal energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability,” and the like. The GND also calls for “massive growth in clean manufacturing.”

“Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us, our country, our world,” Ocasio-Cortez said on NPR’s Morning Edition.'



Read More : The ‘shocking details’ of the Green New Deal (http://www.rt.com/business/450988-green-new-deal-us/)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/520949/shocking-details-green-new-deal)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Corporations See a Different Kind of 'Green' in AOC's 'Green New Deal'
Post by: David Icke Bot on Feb 09, 2019, 07:47:54 am


mintpressnews.com
http://www.mintpressnews.com/ (http://mintpressnews.com/)



Corporations See a Different Kind of 'Green' in Ocasio-Cortez’s 'Green New Deal'
http://www.mintpressnews.com/corporations-see-a-different-kind-of-green-in-ocasio-cortez-green-new-deal/253076/


 

In recent weeks, support from progressives and establishment liberals has been pouring in for the “Green New Deal,” a plan largely promoted by U.S. Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. The plan claims that it seeks to “transform the U.S. economy in an effort to fight climate change” that would ostensibly push the U.S. from fossil fuels to 100 percent renewable energy in a little over a decade.

Though Ocasio-Cortez and others have claimed that the measure is “anti-establishment” and has been mocked by the corporate media, it has recently gained the support of over 30 House Democrats and won endorsements from mainstream media pundits such as Van Jones of CNN. Jones — who is a senior fellow at the Clinton-connected, John Podesta-led think tank the Center for American Progress, and a former Obama adviser — recently called the Ocasio-Cortez-promoted plan “the smartest, most practical idea in U.S. politics to address two urgent problems: climate change and poverty.”

For someone who has campaigned on upending the status quo and challenging the establishment, Ocasio-Cortez and the “Green New Deal” tied so closely to her name sure have won a lot of support from the establishment, and quickly too. While that phenomenon has been touted as evidence that progressive agendas are finally “winning” on Capitol Hill, one need look no further than the text of the Green New Deal on Ocasio-Cortez’s own website to realize that the real reason this plan has gained so much establishment support so quickly is that it is an oligarch-driven corporate answer to climate change and inequality and a wishlist for the neoliberals who still control the core of the Democratic Party.'



Read More : Corporations See a Different Kind of 'Green' in Ocasio-Cortez’s 'Green New Deal' (http://www.mintpressnews.com/corporations-see-a-different-kind-of-green-in-ocasio-cortez-green-new-deal/253076/)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/521088/corporations-see-different-kind-green-ocasio-cortezs-green-new-deal)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: AOC - Exposes Political Corruption & Trump in 5 minutes.
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 10, 2019, 08:04:44 am
AOC - Exposes Political Corruption













Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Feb 12, 2019, 09:12:05 am
We cannot forgot about all the foreign and domestic operatives looking to influence the next presidential election.



Private Mossad for Hire

Inside a plot to influence American elections, starting with one small-town race.

By Adam Entous and Ronan Farrow

https://newyorker.com/magazine/2019/02/18/private-mossad-for-hire

Quote
Psy-Group stood out from many of its rivals because it didn’t just gather intelligence; it specialized in covertly spreading messages to influence what people believed and how they behaved. Its operatives took advantage of technological innovations and lax governmental oversight. “Social media allows you to reach virtually anyone and to play with their minds,” Uzi Shaya, a former senior Israeli intelligence officer, said. “You can do whatever you want. You can be whoever you want. It’s a place where wars are fought, elections are won, and terror is promoted. There are no regulations. It is a no man’s land.”

In recent years, Psy-Group has conceived of a variety of elaborate covert operations. In Amsterdam, the firm prepared a report on a religious sect called the Brunstad Christian Church, whose Norwegian leader, Psy-Group noted, claimed to have written “a more important book than the New Testament.” In Gabon, Psy-Group pitched “Operation Bentley”—an effort to “preserve” President Ali Bongo Ondimba’s hold on power by collecting and disseminating intelligence about his main political rival. (It’s unclear whether or not the operations in Amsterdam and Gabon were carried out. A spokesperson for Brunstad said that it was “plainly ridiculous” that the church considered “any book” to be more important than the Bible. Ondimba’s representatives could not be reached for comment.) In another project, targeting the South African billionaire heirs of an apartheid-era skin-lightening company, Psy-Group secretly recorded family members of the heirs describing them as greedy and, in one case, as a “piece of shit.” In New York, Psy-Group mounted a campaign on behalf of wealthy Jewish-American donors to embarrass and intimidate activists on American college campuses who support a movement to put economic pressure on Israel because of its treatment of the Palestinians.

Psy-Group’s larger ambition was to break into the U.S. election market. During the 2016 Presidential race, the company pitched members of Donald Trump’s campaign team on its ability to influence the results. Psy-Group’s owner, Joel Zamel, even asked Newt Gingrich, the former House Speaker, to offer Zamel’s services to Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law. The effort to drum up business included brash claims about the company’s skills in online deception. The posturing was intended to attract clients—but it also attracted the attention of the F.B.I. Robert Mueller, the special counsel, has been examining the firm’s activities as part of his investigation into Russian election interference and other matters.

Psy-Group’s talks with Benzeevi, after the 2016 election, spurred the company to draw up a plan for developing more business at the state and local levels. No election was too small. One company document reported that Psy-Group’s influence services cost, on average, just three hundred and fifty thousand dollars—as little as two hundred and seventy-five dollars an hour. The new strategy called for pitching more than fifty individuals and groups, including the Republican National Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and major super PACs. The firm published a provocative brochure featuring an image of a goldfish with a shark fin tied to its back, below the tagline “Reality is a matter of perception.” Another brochure showed a cat that cast a lion’s shadow and listed “honey traps” among the firm’s services. (In the espionage world, a honey trap often involves deploying a sexually attractive operative to induce a target to provide information.)



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 12, 2019, 02:47:31 pm
AOC can beat Trump.

But, does that mean she will be allowed to run . . . .
LOL.

What it means is they will only let her run if they decide to dump the trump.
Should they decide to keep Trump, then she will not be allowed to run.

Oh, and having got taken to the cleaners with "anybody but Hillary" they can safely repeat with a "anybody but trump" and get the Green New Deal.

Whoever gets in, its because they want them to do a job, as an employee.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 12, 2019, 07:49:43 pm
Just seen this from WeAreChange.


You Won't Believe What We Found In Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal!













Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: Al Bundy on Feb 13, 2019, 09:55:05 am
Just seen this from WeAreChange.


You Won't Believe What We Found In Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal!













Last Edit by Palmerston

I think that Trump has no reason to panic.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 13, 2019, 10:20:29 am
I think that Trump has no reason to panic.



Last Edit by Palmerston

They are in full panic mode.

Poll :
Trump 43%
AOC 40%

If it was not for the Triggered Trumpers, nobody would have ever heard of AOC.

There is no such thing as bad publicity



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Feb 13, 2019, 01:08:42 pm
I think that Trump has no reason to panic.

With Florida having blatant rampant voter fraud and allowing felons to vote and Texas getting more blue by the day with Trump promoting ethanol, Trump does not have 2020 in the bag. All the big names announcing their presidential runs are jokes, but the last election surprised me already. It's going to be closer than Trump fanatics would like.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 13, 2019, 02:46:31 pm
With Florida having blatant rampant voter fraud and allowing felons to vote and Texas getting more blue by the day with Trump promoting ethanol, Trump does not have 2020 in the bag. All the big names announcing their presidential runs are jokes, but the last election surprised me already. It's going to be closer than Trump fanatics would like.



Last Edit by Palmerston

I get a lot of ironic amusement watching the Trumpbots

AOC said something Daft - Just like Trump
AOC has stupid plan - Just like Trump and his Wall
AOC has no experience - Just like never been elected Trump
AOC is a racist - Just like  Mr I don’t rent to blacks Trump
AOC looks silly - Just like comb over Trump

Thing is, if it was not for their bile online, nobody would have heard of AOC. I seem to to recall that during the last run, all the media did was talk bad about Trump.... But their is no such thing as bad publicity.

Talk about what comes around goes around . . .



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Feb 13, 2019, 03:09:46 pm
I get a lot of ironic amusement watching the Trumpbots

AOC said something Daft - Just like Trump
AOC has stupid plan - Just like Trump and his Wall
AOC has no experience - Just like never been elected Trump
AOC is a racist - Just like  Mr I don’t rent to blacks Trump
AOC looks silly - Just like comb over Trump

Thing is, if it was not for their bile online, nobody would have heard of AOC. I seem to to recall that during the last run, all the media did was talk bad about Trump.... But their is no such thing as bad publicity.

Talk about what comes around goes around . . .

Don't agree with ya on who's more stupider, but yea great point. Same crap coming from both sides, while the constitution keeps drowning. We are dealing with astronomical levels of ignorance and team cheer-leading.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Tulsi Gabbard - Legalize Marijuana, Punish Big Pharma & End Private Prisons
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 14, 2019, 06:27:52 am


themindunleashed.com
http://www.themindunleashed.com/ (http://themindunleashed.com/)



Tulsi Gabbard Wants to Legalize Marijuana, Punish Big Pharma and End Private Prisons
http://themindunleashed.com/2019/02/tulsi-gabbard-legalize-marijuana-punish-big-pharma-end-private-prisons.html


(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/gabbardweed-768x400.jpg)


'Tulsi Gabbard, Hawaii’s democratic congresswoman and one of many entrants in the crowded 2020 presidential race, is already turning heads thanks to her anti-interventionist foreign policy approach and progressive stance on a variety of issues, making her an outlier among establishment Democrats.

If her pre-campaign messaging and campaign launch speech are any indicator, the potential presidential contender has no intention of backing down – especially when it comes to her strong advocacy of medical marijuana and harsh criticisms of the criminal justice system and pharmaceutical industry.

Declaring her formal entrance into the Democratic Party presidential primaries, Gabbard issued a rousing call to end the for-profit prison industry, which has seen private corrections corporations rake in profits while shirking prisoners’ and immigrant detainees’ food, health care, and other essential services while exploiting incarcerated people as essentially slave labor.

Quote
“We must stand up against private prisons, who are profiting off the backs of those caught up in a broken criminal justice system,” Gabbard said.

Continuing, she added that “a system that puts people in prison for smoking marijuana while allowing corporations like Purdue Pharma, who are responsible for the opioid-related deaths of thousands of people, to walk away scot-free with their coffers full.”



Read More : Tulsi Gabbard Wants to Legalize Marijuana, Punish Big Pharma and End Private Prisons (http://themindunleashed.com/2019/02/tulsi-gabbard-legalize-marijuana-punish-big-pharma-end-private-prisons.html)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/521852/tulsi-gabbard-wants-legalize-marijuana-punish-big-pharma-end-private-prisons)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: The ‘Big Pharma’ candidate?
Post by: David Icke Bot on Feb 15, 2019, 06:18:12 am


statnews.com
http://www.statnews.com/ (http://statnews.com/)



The ‘Big Pharma’ candidate? As he runs for president, Cory Booker looks to shake his reputation for drug industry coziness
http://www.statnews.com/2019/02/12/cory-booker-presidential-run-pharmaceutical-industry-ties/


(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/BOOKER-FUEL-1.jpg)


'WASHINGTON — It was a political rally on Cory Booker’s home turf, meant to showcase support for the Affordable Care Act. But the chilly afternoon in January 2017 ended in a way the New Jersey senator did not anticipate: with him being heckled by constituents as a pawn of “Big Pharma.”

Rather than ignore their jeers, Booker’s staff invited roughly 10 protesters to join the senator in a hotel conference room across the street from the Newark rally. He sat for an hour, as the progressive activists berated him for accepting more campaign funds from the drug industry than any other lawmaker and for, just days earlier, voting against a symbolic measure to allow American patients to import prescription drugs from Canada. Finally, Booker asked the question his constituents had been waiting for: if giving back those campaign funds would make them happy. The response was a full-throated yes, capping off a day that was by many accounts an awakening for Booker — and a harbinger of what was to come as he launched his bid for the presidency.

“We can’t solely look at what is in the best interest for pharmaceutical companies and be blind to people dying from the cost of pharmaceuticals in New Jersey,” said Diane Moxley, a local activist who attended the meeting with Booker.

For the past two years, Booker has been repeatedly reminded of that kind of anger over high drug prices — and hounded by criticism that he has an overly cozy relationship with the pharma industry. Last week, the hosts of “Pod Save America,” a progressive political podcast, said he had taken “a bad vote on pharmaceuticals.” A viral Facebook video viewed nearly a quarter-million times questions whether Booker is a “Big Pharma” candidate. And on the left-leaning “Breakfast Club” radio show last week, Booker was pointedly asked whether he could be trusted to hold large pharmaceutical companies accountable.

That reputation, deserved or not, could become a major political liability for Booker, particularly at a time of concern over drug prices and in a race with other progressive lawmakers like Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders whose disdain for large drug companies is palpable.

Booker knows his ability to win over Democrats appears to rest, in part, on whether he can convince voters he’s in the same league. But he is also wary of painting the industry with too broad a brush.'



Read More : The ‘Big Pharma’ candidate? As he runs for president, Cory Booker looks to shake his reputation for drug industry coziness (http://www.statnews.com/2019/02/12/cory-booker-presidential-run-pharmaceutical-industry-ties/)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/522232/big-pharma-candidate-runs-president-cory-booker-looks-shake-reputation-drug-industry-coziness)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: The Truth About Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez With David Icke
Post by: EvadingGrid on Feb 21, 2019, 05:37:00 am


The Truth About Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez With David Icke














Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/523273/truth-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-david-icke)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Ocasio-Cortez denies illegal campaign finance allegations
Post by: David Icke Bot on Mar 06, 2019, 03:56:44 am


Ocasio-Cortez denies illegal campaign finance allegations



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CORTEZ.jpeg)













Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/525430/ocasio-cortez-denies-illegal-campaign-finance-allegations)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Apr 28, 2019, 03:52:41 pm
Been seeing Pete Buttigieg being hyped up by the media.  The words Manchurian candidate come to mind.



The 2020 Presidential Race: Is Mayor Pete Buttigieg the Real Deal?

https://globalresearch.ca/mayor-pete-real-deal/5675701

From the get-go, Mayor Pete’s candidacy appeared to fit neatly into a manufactured identity with the creation as a ‘perfect’ candidate label as if he was deliberately groomed to be totally inoffensive and politically correct; even tempered with no edge. The latest bright, shiny penny to gain prominence, Buttigieg experienced a meteoric rise in the polls raising $7 million and qualified for the June debate before he formally announced he was IN. His unparalleled success as a virtual unknown in a matter of weeks may be credited to some very effective behind-the-scenes movers n shakers willing to fund and provide the necessary organizational support to increase his credibility.

His ‘perfect’ status as a candidate has been noted with attributes carefully shaped to satisfy a wide cross-section of American voters:  he is gay, 37 years old, compares himself to JFK, is an elected municipal official, a ‘devout’ Christian and an Afghanistan war veteran with ‘executive government experience.”

Clearly, millennial Mayor Pete has had friends in high places for some time. The first news article suggesting Buttigieg as a Presidential candidate was a June, 2016 NYT article  “The First Gay President?” That article appeared two weeks after President Obama happened to swing through South Bend and before Mayor Pete ran for DNC Chair in 2017.

More at the link ---> https://www.globalresearch.ca/mayor-pete-real-deal/5675701 (https://www.globalresearch.ca/mayor-pete-real-deal/5675701)



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Apr 28, 2019, 06:44:54 pm


Good find 2Revolutions, first time I ever heard of him, but how many times have they used an "unknown" candidate plucked from obscurity to run as an illuminati candidate !

Certainly from the article, it does contain some warning indicators for the mystery babylon faithful and their more secular henchmen the new world order

For example : Buttigieg made a ‘coming out’ statement as a homosexual in 2015 at the age of 33 soon after his return from Afghanistan.

Not entirely convinced that they seriously need to kick out of office the perfect NeoCon President - who has managed to deceive the conservative faithful. They do desire that the next election to be a close run thing, which invariably rules out the old guard and those that have tried before and failed. They won't run Bernie because he previously failed and he could probably beat trump. AOC could beat Trump. Tulsi Gabbard is to honest and not trully and completely one of their own. Well, they need to find some one and time is running out.

Perhaps we will know when we see a relatively unknown democrat attend Bilderberg or just happen to be passing in the area of Bilderberg.

Oh well.
Not being a qualified psychic, I'll STFU for now.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Apr 28, 2019, 06:52:21 pm
Forgot to add this almost Mena Airport part of his CV :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_Threat_Finance_Cell



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Apr 29, 2019, 05:45:33 am
An article that goes in depth about Pete's background.   I pulled a couple quotes from the article.

---------------------------------------------------

All About Pete

https://currentaffairs.org/2019/03/all-about-pete

Quote
If you know only one thing about Pete Buttigieg, it’s that he’s The Small-Town Mayor Who Is Making A Splash. If you know half a dozen things about Pete Buttigieg, it’s that he’s also young, gay, a Rhodes Scholar, an Arabic-speaking polyglot, and an Afghanistan veteran. If you know anything more than that about Pete Buttigieg, you probably live in South Bend, Indiana. This is a little strange: These are all facts about him, but they don’t tell us much about what he believes or what he advocates. The nationwide attention to Buttigieg seems more to be due to “the fact that he is a highly-credentialed Rust Belt mayor” rather than “what he has actually said and done.” He’s a gay millennial from Indiana, yes. But should he be President of the United States?


Quote
Before I dive into Shortest Way Home’s account of the life and career of Peter Buttigieg, let me be up front about my bias. I don’t trust former McKinsey consultants. I don’t trust military intelligence officers. And I don’t trust the type of people likely to appear on “40 under 40” lists, the valedictorian-to-Harvard-to-Rhodes-Scholarship types who populate the American elite. I don’t trust people who get flattering reams of newspaper profiles and are pitched as the Next Big Thing That You Must Pay Attention To, and I don’t trust wunderkinds who become successful too early. Why? Because I am somewhat cynical about the United States meritocracy. Few people amass these kind of  résumés if they are the type to openly challenge authority. Noam Chomsky says that the factors predicting success in our “meritocracy” are a “combination of greed, cynicism, obsequiousness and subordination, lack of curiosity and independence of mind, [and] self-serving disregard for others.” So when journalists see “Harvard” and think “impressive,” I see it and think “uh-oh.”


Quote
(Ask yourself: If I could do anything I wanted for a living, what would I do?) Pete Buttigieg looked inside himself and decided he belonged at… the world’s most sinister and amoral management consulting company. McKinsey is in the news almost every week for some new horrendous deed, from advising Purdue Pharma on how to “turbocharge” OxyContin sales to counseling dictators worldwide on how to build more efficient autocracies. A former McKinsey consultant recently wrote a long exposé of the firm’s crimes for Current Affairs.

Pete Buttigieg does not recall his time at McKinsey with a sense of moral ambivalence. Today he says it might have been his most “intellectually informing experience,” and by that he doesn’t mean that he saw the dark underbelly of American business. No, he was “learning about the nature of data.” It was a thoroughly neutral experience, “a place to learn.” The most critical thing he will say is that he was “sympathetic” to those who think consulting careers less worthy than “public service.” But ultimately, Buttigieg only left McKinsey because it “could not furnish that deep level of purpose that I craved.”

More at the link ---> https://www.currentaffairs.org/2019/03/all-about-pete (https://www.currentaffairs.org/2019/03/all-about-pete)



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Apr 29, 2019, 06:01:25 am

Good find 2Revolutions, first time I ever heard of him, but how many times have they used an "unknown" candidate plucked from obscurity to run as an illuminati candidate !

Certainly from the article, it does contain some warning indicators for the mystery babylon faithful and their more secular henchmen the new world order

For example : Buttigieg made a ‘coming out’ statement as a homosexual in 2015 at the age of 33 soon after his return from Afghanistan.

Not entirely convinced that they seriously need to kick out of office the perfect NeoCon President - who has managed to deceive the conservative faithful. They do desire that the next election to be a close run thing, which invariably rules out the old guard and those that have tried before and failed. They won't run Bernie because he previously failed and he could probably beat trump. AOC could beat Trump. Tulsi Gabbard is to honest and not trully and completely one of their own. Well, they need to find some one and time is running out.

Perhaps we will know when we see a relatively unknown democrat attend Bilderberg or just happen to be passing in the area of Bilderberg.

Oh well.
Not being a qualified psychic, I'll STFU for now.


This guy just checks all the boxes for manufactured candidate

Harvard graduate
Rhodes scholar
Military intelligence officer deployed to Afghanistan
Worked for a company (McKinsey) that probably has intelligence ties
Gay

I do not know if he will win this presidential election, but the reaction he is getting from the media and democratic voters reminds me of Obama.  The cult of personality is strong with this guy.   It would shock me if we do not see his name on Bilderberg list or at least hinted at that he attended.

Democratic side of orchestrated  political pageantry looks like a skit of clowns trying to fit into one car.  I am guessing this is the elite's response to people complaining about the race was fixed for Hillary early on.   The reality is that list has already been narrowed down to 2 to 3 people by the powers that be.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Apr 29, 2019, 12:11:33 pm
Well done on the research.

My impression has changed as his CV reads like an ideal illuminati new world order replacement for Trump, rather than a credible patsy to run against Trump in 2012.

I'm still wondering why they would want to replace Trump.
Its not like I've seen any signs of an awakening from his fanboyz that he is Mr Swampy and a true NeoCon.

I'm puzzled.
Did not see this coming.

But you are probably right, all the indicators are there and we are just awaiting for an anointment by Bilderberg.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Apr 29, 2019, 01:20:51 pm
Well done on the research.

My impression has changed as his CV reads like an ideal illuminati new world order replacement for Trump, rather than a credible patsy to run against Trump in 2012.

I'm still wondering why they would want to replace Trump.
Its not like I've seen any signs of an awakening from his fanboyz that he is Mr Swampy and a true NeoCon.

I'm puzzled.
Did not see this coming.

But you are probably right, all the indicators are there and we are just awaiting for an anointment by Bilderberg.



Last Edit by Palmerston

I don't see any reason why Trump wouldn't get the nod. Aside from TTP and climate change stuff, he's everything they could ever hope for; while sedating most of everyone who seemed like patriots under Obama. And now with the Russiagate collapse, I'm leaning more back towards him being reelected. I'm seeing people praising Gabbard as the anti-war candidate, but a two minute look at her platform proves she's just another type of socialist/climate dupe. It is hard to read this country now though. The biggest driving force behind Trump are the Christian Zionists, yet the man comes off about as Christian as any old "point of light."

Also, I believe it was last year's Bilderberg or the previous year when the Governor of Colorado (at the time) Hickenlooper was spotted by Luke Rudowski on film attending Bilderberg, while still in office. The guy who helped legalize pot there. (A very humanist move, even though I do disagree with the war on drugs, doesn't mean he's a good guy) I'm slightly surprised we haven't heard about him running. I don't remember any of the names running right now being mentioned at Bilderberg last year.

Btw when and where even is Bilderberg 2019? So few bother with it now.

And wonder-boy Buttigieg seems like he's being prepared for a future role imo. He gets out there into the public this time around, and then 2024 comes around. You know, so long as Trump doesn't make himself president for life or something like he wants. How about a Kushner vs. Buttigieg 2024 election? Man. Talk about two different sides.  ;D  (Yea right)



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Apr 29, 2019, 02:32:27 pm
I don't see any reason why Trump wouldn't get the nod. Aside from TTP and climate change stuff, he's everything they could ever hope for; while sedating most of everyone who seemed like patriots under Obama. And now with the Russiagate collapse, I'm leaning more back towards him being reelected. I'm seeing people praising Gabbard as the anti-war candidate, but a two minute look at her platform proves she's just another type of socialist/climate dupe. It is hard to read this country now though. The biggest driving force behind Trump are the Christian Zionists, yet the man comes off about as Christian as any old "point of light."

Also, I believe it was last year's Bilderberg or the previous year when the Governor of Colorado (at the time) Hickenlooper was spotted by Luke Rudowski on film attending Bilderberg, while still in office. The guy who helped legalize pot there. (A very humanist move, even though I do disagree with the war on drugs, doesn't mean he's a good guy) I'm slightly surprised we haven't heard about him running. I don't remember any of the names running right now being mentioned at Bilderberg last year.

Btw when and where even is Bilderberg 2019? So few bother with it now.

And wonder-boy Buttigieg seems like he's being prepared for a future role imo. He gets out there into the public this time around, and then 2024 comes around. You know, so long as Trump doesn't make himself president for life or something like he wants. How about a Kushner vs. Buttigieg 2024 election? Man. Talk about two different sides.  ;D  (Yea right)



Last Edit by Palmerston

Good memory poseidonlost.  John Hickenlooper is running for president.  He also passed mandatory gun background checks and limited magazine capacity law.

https://sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Democratic-candidate-John-Hickenlooper-proudly-13799631.php

It economic benefially for the power that be that Trump stays in office. I have seen both sides cheer on the war in Syria, Aghanistan and Venezuela.  For example, Democrats who use to be suspicious of US intelligence agenices especially after the Iraq war suddenly have put complete faith in those agenices because they believe that Trump is attacking those agenices.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: poseidonlost on Apr 29, 2019, 03:19:12 pm
Good memory poseidonlost.  John Hickenlooper is running for president.  He also passed mandatory gun background checks and limited magazine capacity law.

https://sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Democratic-candidate-John-Hickenlooper-proudly-13799631.php

It economic benefially for the power that be that Trump stays in office. I have seen both sides cheer on the war in Syria, Aghanistan and Venezuela.  For example, Democrats who use to be suspicious of US intelligence agenices especially after the Iraq war suddenly have put complete faith in those agenices because they believe that Trump is attacking those agenices.



Last Edit by Palmerston

Oh, he actually is running. Ha well then. They aren't making a big deal out of him; yet at least.

And yes. The Trump operation. Both sides are being played like a fiddle and the music is beautiful to the NWO.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Apr 30, 2019, 08:45:50 am


Tulsi Gabbard on Being Attacked by the Democratic Party, the Mainstream Media, the Foreign Policy Establishment and “People Who Represent the Interests of the Military Industrial Complex”












From Tulsi Gabbard: As a soldier, I know the cost of war—on my brothers and sisters in uniform, their families, and the people in those countries where we intervene, whose lives are completely devastated. Over the last two decades, through the Iraq War, the invasion of Libya and the Syrian War, we’ve seen the catastrophic impacts of American intervention. But it’s not only those who are impacted by combat who pay the price—every single American pays the price for these wars. My mission as president will be to put an end to wasteful and reckless regime change wars, the new Cold War and nuclear arms race, and introduce a Peace Dividend to reinvest the trillions that would be spent on those wars to instead meet the needs of the American people. Our needs are great—redirecting those trillions of dollars means investing in universal healthcare and education, climate change solutions, clean air and water for our communities, rebuilding our nation's crumbling infrastructure, investing in a green energy economy, and protecting Social Security for seniors. The people in charge of our foreign policy—the ones ratcheting up tensions with Russia, China and North Korea, the ones who are making the case for regime change war in Syria, Venezuela and Iran, either don’t know or don’t care about the true cost of war and the very real threat of nuclear war in our world today. To effectively address the threats we face in a global economy and as a global community - including nuclear war, climate change and global pandemics—we need to get out of the Cold War mentality that pits one nation against another nation. This is fossilized 20th century thinking that doesn't fit the world we live in today. We're not in a win-lose scenario anymore—we have to be committed both militarily and economically to a win-win approach based on cooperation for mutual security and prosperity. Regardless of party or label—Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Progressives—we must come together to bring about a sea change in our approach to foreign policy. This is why I’m running for president: to institute a Peace Dividend by ending regime change war, ending the new Cold War and nuclear arms race, taking the trillions of dollars wasted in these wars and giving them back to the American people. With this Peace Dividend, we can provide Medicare for All, we can protect Social Security, we can ensure our students have access to an affordable education, we can rebuild our nation’s crumbling infrastructure and we can protect our air and water, to build a brighter future for all Americans.



Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/533885/tulsi-gabbard-attacked-democratic-party-mainstream-media-foreign-policy-establishment-people-represent-interests-military-industrial-complex)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Cory’s Plan to End Gun Ownership in the US
Post by: 2Revolutions on May 13, 2019, 06:32:45 am
Presidential Candidates will be falling over themselves to see who has the better gun confiscation plan.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Cory’s Plan to End the Gun Violence Epidemic

https://medium.com/@corybooker/corys-plan-to-end-the-gun-violence-epidemic-ab377d9fb112


National Gun License

Require handgun microstamping

Ban assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, and bump stocks  (No grandfathering.)

Support extreme risk prevention order laws (Gun confiscation without due process)

Limit gun buyers to one handgun per month

Require firearm owners to report lost or stolen firearms

Modernize and strengthen the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) (National gun registry)

All sales of guns must go through federal/state background check system

Provide dedicated funding for research on gun violence as a public health issue  (Money for bias research to affirm gun confiscation and restrictions)



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 - Dems get rid of Tulsi Gabbard
Post by: EvadingGrid on Sep 10, 2019, 12:51:13 pm


Dems Engineering Tulsi Gabbard Out of Contention: Fantasy US Democracy in Action



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/TULSI-GABBARD-1.jpg)


Aspirants for the US presidency and key congressional leadership positions are considered unqualified for being anti-war/pro-social justice — the process rigged against them.

In 2016, undemocratic Dems engineered Hillary’s nomination over Sanders by primary election fraud.

Things were cooked for her to win the key New York primary — by disenfranchising over 125,000 registered Dems, along with countless independents.

She stole Iowa by rigged coin-flips – Massachusetts, Nevada and Arizona by old-fashioned fraud.

She became Dem standard bearer by election-rigging. Former acting DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile accused her of a conducting a hugely unethical power play to usurp control of the party during the primary season — including by money-laundering fundraising.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>

Anti-war presidential aspirant Tulsi Gabbard opposes US intervention abroad, especially perpetual wars with no end of them in prospect.

Earlier she said “knowing first-hand the cost of war, both on our service members, on our veterans, as well as the cost on the people in the countries where we intervene, as well as the trillions of dollars, our taxpayer dollars, that are spent on waging these wars, dollars that are sorely needed to address the very real urgent needs of our families, our communities, our neighbors right here at home” — she called for using the nation’s resources for domestic needs.

“No more wars for regime change, like Syria and Afghanistan,” she said — opposing intervention abroad as well for regime change in Iran, Venezuela and elsewhere.

“The United States needs to stay out of Venezuela,” she stressed. “Let the Venezuelan people determine their future. We don’t want other countries to choose our leaders—so we have to stop trying to choose theirs.”

She opposes regime change/war-mongering threats against Iran, wants US involvement in Syria and Yemen ended.

Dems are engineering her out of contention by excluding her from further debates, wanting her denied a nationwide public stage.

Unacceptable DNC rules require presidential aspirants to have 130,000 unique donors, at least 400 of them in 20 states, along with at least 2% support in four or more DNC-approved polls between June 28 and August 28 — ones they control to assure candidates they oppose are disqualified.

According to rigged Dem rules, Gabbard didn’t make the cut — despite exceeding 2% support in 26 national and state polls, including by leading broadsheets in New Hampshire and South Carolina.

On August 23, ahead of this week’s Dem debate, her campaign called on the DNC “to revise (its) list of debate qualifying polls to ensure transparency and fairness in light of numerous irregularities in the selection and timing of those polls.”

Dems haven’t released criteria for selecting polling organizations they consider “certified.”

Contributor to Real Clear Politics Michael Tracey said Gabbard is being “victimized (by) dubious (DNC) criteria that appear increasingly absurd.”

Her support exceeds other Dems included in next week’s debate. She’s excluded for being anti-war and pro-social justice.

RT reported that “Gabbard was the most googled candidate after her second debate, and had a standout moment when she confronted Kamala Harris’ record of incarcerating people for marijuana use when she was attorney general. She was also the most googled candidate during the first debate.”<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>

Colorado Senator Michael Bennet also slammed the DNC process for “stifling debate at a time when we need it most,” adding:

“We’re rewarding celebrity candidates with millions of Twitter followers, billionaires who buy their way onto the debate stage, and candidates who have been running for president for years.”

For supporting peace, social justice, and criticizing US foreign interventions, establishment media oppose Gabbard — supporting dirty business as usual candidates instead.

Her “vision for America” includes peace over endless wars, “access to nourishing food…everyone receiv(ing) the medical care they need…a roof over their head…education they need, and is able to find good paying, fulfilling work (without) worry(ing) about making ends meet in their old age.”

Her Stop Arming Terrorist Act called for ending direct and indirect US support for ISIS and other jihadists.

She wants countless trillions of dollars spend for militarism and warmaking directed to vital homeland needs.

Political rhetoric is one thing, policies another in office. Gabbard’s views are no guarantee of what she’d support if elected to the nation’s highest office, given enormous pressure brought to bear on incumbents by dark forces.

Yet US presidential aspirants don’t espouse views like hers. With things rigged against her for voicing an anti-war/progressive agenda, it’ll likely never be known how she’d operate as president and commander-in-chief.

Note: <a class="autohyperlink" href="http://davidicke.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">davidicke.com[/url] explained that “spineless fraud,” longtime political conman/progressive in name only Bernie Sanders failed to “defend Tulsi Gabbard or shame (the) DNC for cheating her out of” this week’s debate.


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/552403/dems-engineering-tulsi-gabbard-contention-fantasy-us-democracy-action)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Sep 15, 2019, 08:28:54 pm
Documenting more about the intelligence asset, Pete Buttgieg who out raised Joe Biden by 3 million in 2nd quarter.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The trips to war zones that Pete Buttigieg rarely talks about

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mckinsey-mystery-pete-buttigiegs-foreign-policy-resume/story?id=63883038

On a mild summer Tuesday this month, Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg stood before hundreds of supporters at an Indiana University auditorium and laid out his plan for American foreign policy.

It was a vision shaped in part by his deployment to Afghanistan in 2014 as a U.S. Navy Reserve intelligence officer, he told the crowd, an experience he referenced four times in that speech and brings up often on the campaign trail.

But what the 37-year-old South Bend mayor didn't mention, and virtually never discusses in his run for the nation's highest office, were other trips to Afghanistan and Iraq years prior to his military deployment, when he was a 20-something civilian contractor for the global consulting firm McKinsey & Company.

Buttigieg worked for McKinsey from 2007 to 2010, after completing post-graduate studies at Oxford. In his memoir, "Shortest Way Home," he mentions his involvement in domestic projects for the firm like doing energy efficiency research in the U.S., and goes into particular detail about one that involved analyzing North American grocery prices.

But when it comes to his work abroad with McKinsey, he only drops hints about working on "war zone economic development to help grow private sector employment" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He also refers to a "safe house" in Baghdad. The book doesn't say exactly when or how long Buttigieg was in either country.

And beyond that, details are scarce -- by design.

‘The strictest confidentiality'

"So McKinsey, the way it works, is truly on a confidential basis. They won't mention publicly what project they'll do," Taufiq Rahim, a former McKinsey consultant in the Middle East and current New America senior fellow, told ABC News. "Sometimes their work comes to the fore in this region, but they're generally able to be even more secretive here."

More at the link ---> https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mckinsey-mystery-pete-buttigiegs-foreign-policy-resume/story?id=63883038 (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mckinsey-mystery-pete-buttigiegs-foreign-policy-resume/story?id=63883038)



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: Al Bundy on Sep 16, 2019, 05:24:07 am
Documenting more about the intelligence asset, Pete Buttgieg who out raised Joe Biden by 3 million in 2nd quarter.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The trips to war zones that Pete Buttigieg rarely talks about

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mckinsey-mystery-pete-buttigiegs-foreign-policy-resume/story?id=63883038

On a mild summer Tuesday this month, Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg stood before hundreds of supporters at an Indiana University auditorium and laid out his plan for American foreign policy.

It was a vision shaped in part by his deployment to Afghanistan in 2014 as a U.S. Navy Reserve intelligence officer, he told the crowd, an experience he referenced four times in that speech and brings up often on the campaign trail.

But what the 37-year-old South Bend mayor didn't mention, and virtually never discusses in his run for the nation's highest office, were other trips to Afghanistan and Iraq years prior to his military deployment, when he was a 20-something civilian contractor for the global consulting firm McKinsey & Company.

Buttigieg worked for McKinsey from 2007 to 2010, after completing post-graduate studies at Oxford. In his memoir, "Shortest Way Home," he mentions his involvement in domestic projects for the firm like doing energy efficiency research in the U.S., and goes into particular detail about one that involved analyzing North American grocery prices.

But when it comes to his work abroad with McKinsey, he only drops hints about working on "war zone economic development to help grow private sector employment" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He also refers to a "safe house" in Baghdad. The book doesn't say exactly when or how long Buttigieg was in either country.

And beyond that, details are scarce -- by design.

‘The strictest confidentiality'

"So McKinsey, the way it works, is truly on a confidential basis. They won't mention publicly what project they'll do," Taufiq Rahim, a former McKinsey consultant in the Middle East and current New America senior fellow, told ABC News. "Sometimes their work comes to the fore in this region, but they're generally able to be even more secretive here."

More at the link ---> https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mckinsey-mystery-pete-buttigiegs-foreign-policy-resume/story?id=63883038 (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mckinsey-mystery-pete-buttigiegs-foreign-policy-resume/story?id=63883038)



Last Edit by Palmerston

Yes and no. Trump's followers are certainly in a panic because of Biden who will be supported by all MSM. However, if Trump finishes the border Wall , even those who don't like him will vote for him.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Sep 16, 2019, 09:08:06 am
Yes and no. Trump's followers are certainly in a panic because of Biden who will be supported by all MSM. However, if Trump finishes the border Wall , even those who don't like him will vote for him.

Hey Al,

I don't think Buttgieg will win in 2020, but I think he is being positioned for a future run.  The fact that a so called "small town" mayor raised 24 million dollars is worthy of note.

Honestly, I am not sure which NWO lackey will win in 2020.  I guess it depends on whether those in power believe that Trump can be of further use for another 4 years.   IMO, Biden is Trump without the tweeting.  By many Americans are willing to overlook that because they want a president who is a refined liar and psychopath.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: Al Bundy on Sep 16, 2019, 09:37:03 am
Hey Al,

I don't think Buttgieg will win in 2020, but I think he is being positioned for a future run.  The fact that a so called "small town" mayor raised 24 million dollars is worthy of note.

Honestly, I am not sure which NWO lackey will win in 2020.  I guess it depends on whether those in power believe that Trump can be of further use for another 4 years.   IMO, Biden is Trump without the tweeting.  By many Americans are willing to overlook that because they want a president who is a refined liar and psychopath.

Hey 2Revolutions,

You didn't write to me whether or not Trump built the wall toward Mexico.

Which "lakey" will win? The one who convinces "Masters of Puppets" that it will continue its confrontation with China and is ready
to invade either Iran or Venezuela. Cold relations with Russia are implied.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Sep 16, 2019, 10:50:39 am
2% of "The Wall" has been built
Hillary is walking free

BUT "Trump has kept all his promises" - Alex Jones.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: 2Revolutions on Sep 16, 2019, 02:03:07 pm
Hey 2Revolutions,

You didn't write to me whether or not Trump built the wall toward Mexico.

Which "lakey" will win? The one who convinces "Masters of Puppets" that it will continue its confrontation with China and is ready
to invade either Iran or Venezuela. Cold relations with Russia are implied.



Last Edit by Palmerston

If this Administration is actually building a wall it so that the people in the US cannot escape.  I think people are advocating for their own enslavement.   They are not building a great wall of China,  they building prison walls for all of US.



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: Al Bundy on Sep 16, 2019, 03:22:41 pm
If this Administration is actually building a wall it so that the people in the US cannot escape.  I think people are advocating for their own enslavement.   They are not building a great wall of China,  they building prison walls for all of US.



Last Edit by Palmerston

People want to escape from richest country in the world...in Mexico ? You are kidding with Balkan Boy.  ;)



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Hillary Clinton, the Political Class and the war on Tulsi Gabbard
Post by: EvadingGrid on Oct 22, 2019, 01:54:42 am


Hillary Clinton, the Political Class and the war on Tulsi Gabbard



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GABBARD-WAR.jpg)













Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/556982/hillary-clinton-political-class-war-tulsi-gabbard)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Oct 25, 2019, 01:17:45 am


Tulsi Gabbard Needs to Be Stopped. She's Telling People the Truth About US Wars



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GABBARD-DEMOCRAT-DEBATE.jpg)


'No wonder Democratic Party bosses and mainstream media are trying to bury presidential contender Tulsi Gabbard. She is the only candidate, perhaps the only politician in the US, who is telling the American public exactly what they need to know about what their government and military are really up to: fighting illegal regime-change wars, and to boot, sponsoring terrorists for that purpose.

It didn’t come much clearer nor more explicit than when Gabbard fired up the Democratic TV debate this week. It was billed as the biggest televised presidential debate ever, and the Hawaii Representative told some prime-time home-truths to the nation:

“Donald Trump has blood of the Kurds on his hands, but so do many of the politicians in our country from both parties who have supported this ongoing regime-change war in Syria that started in 2011… along with many in the mainstream media who have been championing and cheer-leading this regime-change war.”

The 38-year-old military veteran went on to denounce how the US has sponsored Al Qaeda terrorists for its objective of overthrowing the government in Damascus.

It was a remarkably damning assessment of US policy in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East. And it was by no means the first time that Gabbard has leveled with the American people on the brutality and criminality of Washington’s so-called “interventions”.

The other 11 Democratic candidates on the stage during the TV debate looked agog after Gabbard’s devastating and calmly delivered statement. All the others have proffered the false narrative that US forces are in Syria to “fight terrorism”. They deplore Trump’s announcement last week to pull back US troops from northeast Syria because, they say, it will undermine the fight against Islamic State (IS or ISIS) and other Al Qaeda affiliates. They also condemn Trump for “betraying Kurdish allies” by his partial troop withdrawal.

President Donald Trump talks about “ending endless wars” and “bringing our troops home”. But he still premises his views on a credulous belief that the US under his watch “defeated ISIS 100 per cent”. In that way, he essentially shares the same corny view as the Democrats and media that America is a force for good, that it is the “good guys wearing white hats riding into the sunset”.'

Read more: Tulsi Gabbard Needs to Be Stopped. She's Telling People the Truth About US Wars (https://russia-insider.com/en/tulsi-gabbard-needs-be-stopped-shes-telling-people-truth-about-us-wars/ri27795)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/557286/tulsi-gabbard-needs-stopped-shes-telling-people-truth-us-wars)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Nov 13, 2019, 01:57:39 am


Tulsi Gabbard surges in Democratic race despite all the efforts to destroy her



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GABBARD-DEMOCRAT-DEBATE-1.jpg)













Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/558681/tulsi-gabbard-surges-democratic-race-despite-efforts-destroy)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: Al Bundy on Nov 24, 2019, 03:05:08 pm
M. Bloomberg ?



Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Nov 25, 2019, 12:18:06 pm
M. Bloomberg ?



Last Edit by Palmerston

Heard his name being suggested on the car radio going to and from work.


Found this :

Michael Bloomberg Joins 2020 Democratic Field for President
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/24/us/politics/michael-bloomberg-2020-presidency.html




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: EvadingGrid on Nov 25, 2019, 12:30:43 pm


Michael Bloomberg confirms White House run and kicks off $30m ad buy



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/BLOOMBERG-RUN-IMAGE2.jpg)


'Former New York City mayor <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/michaelbloomberg" data-link-name="auto-linked-tag" data-component="auto-linked-tag">Michael Bloomberg[/url] announced a presidential run on Sunday, unveiling a minute-long campaign video that called the billionaire, one of the richest men in the world, a “middle class kid who made good”.

“I’m running for president to defeat <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/donaldtrump" data-link-name="auto-linked-tag" data-component="auto-linked-tag">Donald Trump[/url] and rebuild America,” Bloomberg said in a statement. “We cannot afford four more years of President Trump’s reckless and unethical actions. He represents an existential threat to our country and our values. If he wins another term in office, we may never recover from the damage.”

The Bloomberg campaign aimed to make up for an unusually late entry in the Democratic primary with historic spending on national advertising and an unorthodox strategy for navigating the primary calendar. Bloomberg has expressed concern that none of the top candidates can defeat Trump.

Bloomberg’s campaign has reserved more than $30m in television ad time, called the largest ad buy in primary election history. His first ad touts his performance as mayor after the September 11 attacks and his work on gun control, climate change and other issues.'

Raed more: Michael Bloomberg confirms White House run and kicks off $30m ad buy (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/24/michael-bloomberg-2020-presidential-campaign-ad)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/559462/michael-bloomberg-confirms-white-house-run-kicks-off-30m-ad-buy)




Last Edit by Gladstone
Title: Re: Who can beat Trump 2020 and has the Trumpbots panicking ?
Post by: Al Bundy on Nov 25, 2019, 02:17:06 pm


Michael Bloomberg confirms White House run and kicks off $30m ad buy



(https://admin62b4b.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/BLOOMBERG-RUN-IMAGE2.jpg)


'Former New York City mayor <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/michaelbloomberg" data-link-name="auto-linked-tag" data-component="auto-linked-tag">Michael Bloomberg[/url] announced a presidential run on Sunday, unveiling a minute-long campaign video that called the billionaire, one of the richest men in the world, a “middle class kid who made good”.

“I’m running for president to defeat <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/donaldtrump" data-link-name="auto-linked-tag" data-component="auto-linked-tag">Donald Trump[/url] and rebuild America,” Bloomberg said in a statement. “We cannot afford four more years of President Trump’s reckless and unethical actions. He represents an existential threat to our country and our values. If he wins another term in office, we may never recover from the damage.”

The Bloomberg campaign aimed to make up for an unusually late entry in the Democratic primary with historic spending on national advertising and an unorthodox strategy for navigating the primary calendar. Bloomberg has expressed concern that none of the top candidates can defeat Trump.

Bloomberg’s campaign has reserved more than $30m in television ad time, called the largest ad buy in primary election history. His first ad touts his performance as mayor after the September 11 attacks and his work on gun control, climate change and other issues.'

Raed more: Michael Bloomberg confirms White House run and kicks off $30m ad buy (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/24/michael-bloomberg-2020-presidential-campaign-ad)


Icke (http://davidicke.com/article/559462/michael-bloomberg-confirms-white-house-run-kicks-off-30m-ad-buy)




Last Edit by Palmerston

Yes but they have more than one in White House.  :(



Last Edit by Gladstone