You are Here:
Another Flip? Trump Tells Congress Iran Compliant With "Disastrous" Nuclear Deal

Author (Read 1229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

 

EvadingGrid

  • Rat Catcher (retired)
  • Administrator
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 7319
    Posts
ZeroHedge
Another Flip? Trump Tells Congress Iran Compliant With "Disastrous" Nuclear Deal
Tyler Durden's picture
by Tyler Durden
Apr 19, 2017 8:27 AM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-19/another-flip-trump-tells-congress-iran-compliant-disastrous-nuclear-deal



We are all running on Gods laptop.
The problem is the virus called the Illuminati.
 

 

Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 545
    Posts
ZeroHedge
Another Flip? Trump Tells Congress Iran Compliant With "Disastrous" Nuclear Deal


From that article:

..."However, it appears there is movement towards Trump's campaign promises, as U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said late Tuesday that the Trump administration is weighing whether to effectively break the terms of the Iran nuclear deal, while certifying that the Islamic nation is upholding terms of the landmark 2015 agreement. The administration is looking at whether to continue lifting sanctions the Obama administration agreed to under the nuclear deal negotiated by six world powers.

The review was ordered by President Donald Trump, Tillerson said in the letter. He called it an effort "to evaluate whether continuing to lift sanctions would be in U.S. national security interests."

Tillerson said in a letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan that "Iran remains a leading state sponsor of terror through many platforms and methods."


========================================

US Predictably Turns "Iran Deal" into Confrontation
https://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/search/label/middle%20east
Tony Cartalucci - NEO
March 2, 2017



The so-called "Iran Deal" was never meant to serve as
a starting point for rapprochement between Washington and Tehran, 
but rather as a pretext for greater confrontation.


US President Donald Trump's administration capitalized on developments in Saudi Arabia's losing war in Yemen, as well as a missile test conducted by the Iranian government, to portray Iran as ungrateful for a diplomatic deal the administration's now resigned National Security Adviser Michael Flynn suggested should never have been made in the first place.

The Guardian's article, "Trump administration 'officially putting Iran on notice', says Michael Flynn," would state:
And while Flynn's comments before his abrupt resignation sound like the genuine, if not hypocritical stance of Trump presidency, those who have followed the actual brokers of US foreign policy recognize the very familiar script Flynn is reading from - and it is a script written not by the Trump administration, but by unelected corporate-financier funded policy think tanks, years before "President Trump" took office.

Flynn's resignation will have little impact on this policy, since it has been planned, and systematically implemented years before Donald Trump even began his presidential campaign. The fact that Flynn's stance on Iran is reflected by those remaining in Trump's administration is proof enough of this.

The Brookings Institution paper titled, "The Path to Persia: Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran" (.pdf), would explicitly lay out America's regime change conspiracy arrayed against Tehran, stating (emphasis added):
Brookings' "superb offer" was clearly presented to both the public and Tehran in the form of the so-called Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) or the "Iran Deal" in 2015. And while Washington attempted to convince the world it sought rapprochement with Tehran, even as it pursued this deal, it poured money, weapons, and even direct military support into the attempted overthrow of Iran's ally, Syria - another prerequisite enumerated by the 2009 Brookings report ahead of war with Iran.

The deal then, was disingenuous from its inception, its betrayal all but inevitable when Washington felt the political and strategic climate was optimal for portraying Tehran as duplicitous, and justifying a wider confrontation - particularly with both Syria significantly weakened after 6 years of war, and Iran significantly tied up financially and militarily in Syria's fate.

“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
Martin Luther King Jr.
 

 

2Revolutions

  • Global Moderator
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 1256
    Posts
I always remember General Wesley exposing the NeoCon plan.   It does not matter who the president is,  the neocon globalist plan continues.   


General Wesley Clark: The US will attack 7 countries in 5 years

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUCwCgthp_E

 

 

Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Mega InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 545
    Posts
I always remember General Wesley exposing the NeoCon plan.   It does not matter who the president is,  the neocon globalist plan continues.   


Yes, the agenda has continued without interruption since 2001...
political party doesn't matter,
the puppet in the oval office does what he's told,
and the agenda continues.

Iran is the jewel in the crown.
“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
Martin Luther King Jr.
 

 

Powered by EzPortal