You are Here:
Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!

Author (Read 13924 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #24 on: February 23, 2009, 02:09:10 am »



BTW I think you are the man to ask this question of ...

.... are the individual US "States" the same as individual "Countries"?

Does Colorado for instance have the 'same' sovereignty as, let's say France for instance, in the European Union?

The short answer to your question is yes...they are independent Sovereign States but it is a bit more complex than that. We as states have bound ourselves together, for our mutual defense and tranquil interaction, by a contractual agreement with the other states called the "Constitution for the United States of America and Bill of Rights." This contract also creates an agency called the federal government, which is set out to administer on the global stage the affairs of these United States, and as designed, it functions within the constraints of those powers which are enumerated within the Constitutional agreement and no more.

As history shows, this Constitutional union has been under constant attack by global interests since the very second the final signature was affixed, ratifying The Constitution and Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791.

This contract has been fooled-with greatly since the Civil War however, done by way of the Amendment process, to where with each amendment, greater and greater power was syphoned from the people to the federal agent. A very small portion of this 140 year "Amendment Fest" is arguably needed, but only if it enhances the lot of the principles, namely the states and the people.  That has not been the case however, the vast majority of this amendment power has been pure usurpation and unlawful extension of federal control, at the expense of the states and the people.

The 10th Amendment Sovereignty Movement, as it is originally designed, is a two step process to rein in the federal government, pulling it back into its constitutionally circumscribed mode of operation, and Constitutionally mandates the states to do what ever is necessary within the bounds of the Constitution to accomplish this task.

The states themselves, prior to the 17th amendment, actually had representation within the federal system, because the Senators were originally selected not by a vote of the people but by a vote of the state assembly. Under this new 10th amendment scrutiny, the chicanery and shenanigans of the globalists on the federal level as well as their infiltrators on the state level will be brought to light, and you will see many of the post-Civil War "constitutional" amendments come under fire by the states, and many will disappear. One duly ratified amendment however, that was unlawfully removed in the "Ordering out of Chaos" mode, after the Civil War, will reappear in it's rightful spot.

This movement is NOT a de facto constitutional convention to change the constitution. It uses the 10th amendment as its power and mode of operation restrained only by the Constitution itself, all law contained in the fully ratified Constitution, is beyond tampering. Any well thought out 10th amendment sovereignty resolution will reaffirm that the 1791 Constitution for the United States of America and Bill of Rights is the supreme law of the land as it stands, and SHALL NOT be altered for it sets the baseline for ALL that is considered Constitutional as laid out in these resolutions. The organic 1791 Constitution is the basis of what IS constitutional and cannot be changed in any way by this movement.

Now the rest of the amendments... and anyone who's been studying this for any length of time knows that the fully ratified and documented original 13th amendment was unlawfully yet cleverly replaced by Lincoln's anti-slavery 13th amendment. Every amendment that follows has been specifically designed to concentrate more power, in dovetailing small increments, in favor of the federal agent, at the expense of the states and the people. Each of these latter amendments should be looked at carefully in the light of original intent, since the Agent, (feds) should never be allowed by long term stealth, to usurp the rights and power of the principle, namely, the States and the People.

JTCoyoté

''...on every question of construction [of the Constitution], let us carry
ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the
spirit manifested in the Debates, & instead of trying what meaning may be
squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one
in which it was passed.''
~Thomas Jefferson
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #25 on: February 23, 2009, 02:49:54 am »


JTCoyote:
Thanks for responding ... and a very fine answer, too.

It seems that you would say that the individual State/Country has a Constitutional authority to defend it's citizens against unlawful Federal Employees in DC who are acting against their interests - and a Constitutional duty to throw off the yoke of oppression - by any means necessary?

How about secession - is it legal under the Constitution in your opinion?



Thank you.

Even in contract law if you break a contract by whatever means for whatever purpose, you loose all protection under the contract... For any state to secede from this Constitutional Union of states, is to break the contract with the other 49 states. It would be the thoughtless doing of unwitting, emotionally charged individuals, suffering from a lack of knowledge and patience... as was the case that led up to the Civil War.

Though the Constitution does not anticipate secession, the law of common law contracts as it reaches back into the dim dark recesses of time, gives a pretty good idea of what happens when you break a contract. The Civil War is a more recent example.

The Constitution contains remedy in situations of state grievances however, and when the grievance is against the contract created federal power, this remedy is contained within the Constitution at the 9th and 10th amendments. Why would you want to abrogate the protection of the other 49 states, just to satiate some desire to be seen as somehow unique in a stand alone position against a rogue foreign power masquerading as our federal agent? The state that abrogates the Constitution rather than working within this marvelous eternal contract, shows poor judgment indeed.

If you read it you will see that it is probably one of the most ironclad and perfectly crafted pieces of legal equity and agreement ever produced. In any case the act of secession and the forming of a separate "union" is what created the "War Between The States", and any repetition would again lead to a similar globalist ignited false flag war.

Each individual within each of the states needs to ponder the question. When deciding between using the Constitution as it was designed, to peacefully gain remedy, or throw it away in a charged moment and take the chance, of getting something akin to a slave document, or even worse.

The Constitution and Bill of Rights for the United States of America, was written at an eighth grade level of English composition, grammar, and understanding, yet it has taken the globalist bastards over 200 years to undermine it, and at that they are having to cheat. We, as these United States of America can stop them, and take it all back in one legislative session if we keep our wits, rein in our emotions, and stay the course -- at which point the Founding Fathers will rise up in proud admiration of our desire for seeing their vision true. They would cease spinning in their graves as they have been, low this last 150 years since the Civil War.

--Oldyoti

"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance;
and a people who mean to be their own
governors must arm themselves with the
power which knowledge gives."

~James Madison
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #26 on: February 23, 2009, 01:57:50 pm »


So basically a constitutional convention could be used to undermine a 10th amendment sovereignty movement? Is this what all the noise about the constitutional convention was about? A convention is a very powerful tool. It could just as easily be used to abolish the bill of rights as well as fix the Federal problem. Are we still in danger of the amount need for a convention as we were earlier? From what I understand a Convention is like trying to use a sledge hammer to fix a china cabinet.

Yes!

When this 10th Amendment Sovereignty movement first began back in 1994, on the very day that Colorado passed the first one, the globalist counterattacks began. There were two methods they used that utilized the legislative process. They manifested as a flurry of bills that were siphoned down by the House and Senate leadership in the State House.  They came from governmental think tanks like the Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations, (ACIR). These pieces of legislation have hidden within them poison pill redefinitions of constitutional provisions, applying federal statutes as the over-arching precedent in determining law.

The second type of legislation, utilized popular public grievances as a reason to put forth bills and resolutions calling for a constitutional convention, (Con-Con).  This constitutional convention approach culminated in a supposed grass roots movement called the Conference of States which attempted to usurp the 10th amendment as it's purpose, and call for a conference of state delegates... cleverly hiding the fact that it was a call for a constitutional convention.

On the very day that the first 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolution, HJR-94-1035 was passed and adopted in Colorado on April 21, 1994, another bill was introduced by the leadership. It was titled "Concerning the implementation of federal mandates," SB-94-157. It redefined the 10th amendment within the state, by giving the feds the power to determine the meaning of the 10th amendment as it pertained to the state. It was an extremely arrogant attempt at usurping the constitutional power of Colorado.

The third method that the bastards used, were shill groups, agent provocateurs, and infiltration techniques all hell-bent on attaching the term secessionism, and pre-Civil War style racism to the 10th Amendment Resolution Movement... Many of you probably wonder why I so closely police secessionists threads on this forum... this is why.  Whether these people are aware of it or not, their secession movements were designed by the globalists back in the 1850s as a divide and conquer system to break up constitutional 10th Amendment action by the states, by characterizing it as secessionism. They were instrumental in fomenting and initiating The War Between the States.

Secessionists, whether they know it or not, are willing or unwilling shills of the New World order. Most don't have a clue about this and will unwittingly defend secessionism to the death, wrongly believing that it is the only way.

Make no mistake about it once the method for deflating the federal power was re-discovered back in 1994... The global/federal power began throwing everything except the kitchen sink at us... and finally in desperation, on April 19, 1995 they provocateured the destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah is building in Oklahoma City, killing 170 people and used the president's bully pulpit, and the MSM to blame the destruction on lawful patriot groups, and lawful state militias, and defuse the growing Sovereignty Movement. We are onto them this time though.

If you're going to defend your liberty at this stage in the game, be prepared, because they will not stop at anything, they will send in a provocateur to woo your wife away from you, to another state, and then leave her flat. I speak from experience on this one. Or they will send in a provocateur woman to entice you away... they will dig into your specific background and find something that they can blackmail you with... these are the "worst of the worst", these agents of tyranny... Be Advised.

I am in the process of putting together a 6hr dvd, that lays out the history of the 10th Amendment Sovereignty movement from the beginning. A retrospective which includes vintage radio broadcasts of the events, introduced bills and talks by the enemy describing their tactics, and interviews and speeches by Rep./Sen Charles Duke and others. This is preemptive damage control so the people new to this idea of state sovereignty don't try to reinvent the wheel here, by repeating the mistakes that were made the first time around.

--Oldyoti

"The reason for the Second Amendment may not be
fully understood until such time as it is needed."

~Thomas Jefferson
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #27 on: February 26, 2009, 07:04:46 pm »

jofortruth dug this one up. Here's the Iowa Resolution SJR 15:

http://www2.legis.state.ia.us/GA/76GA/Legislation/SJR/00000/SJR00015/Current.html

Previous Day: Wednesday, March 1   
Next Day:Previous Page: 507   
Today's Journal Page
Senate Journal: Page 508: Thursday, March 2, 1995
Senate Journal: Index    House Journal: Index
Legislation: Index    Bill History: Index


             HOUSE MESSAGE RECEIVED AND CONSIDERED

         The following message was received from the Chief Clerk of the
    House:

         MR. PRESIDENT: I am directed to inform your honorable body that the
    House has on March 2, 1995, passed the following bill in which the
    concurrence of the Senate is asked:

         House File 189, a bill for an act relating to the funding of state
    mandates.

         This bill was read first time and passed on file.

                           INTRODUCTION OF RESOLUTIONS

         Senate Resolution 10, by Giannetto, a senate resolution urging the
    Congress of the United States to authorize interest-free loans to the
    states and their political subdivisions for capital projects.

         Read first time and passed on file.

         Senate Joint Resolution 15, by Borlaug, Lundby, Priebe, Bisignano,
    Kibbie, Rensink, Hedge, McKean, Freeman, Banks, Palmer, Jensen, Flynn,
    Boettger, Drake, Bennett, Rittmer, Maddox, McLaren, Kramer, and Zieman,
    a joint resolution claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the
    United States Constitution over all powers not otherwise enumerated and
    granted to the federal government and demanding that the federal
    government cease mandates that are beyond the scope of its
    constitutional powers.

         Read first time and passed on file.

*********************************

  Text: SJR00014                          Text: SJR00016
Text: SJR00000 - SJR00099               Text: SJR Index
Bills and Amendments: General Index     Bill History: General Index

Senate Joint Resolution 15
Partial Bill History

    * Bill Introduced: S.J. 508
    * Complete Bill History

Bill Text

PAG LIN
  1  1    That Iowa and the people thereof hereby claim sovereignty
  1  2 under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
  1  3 States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to
  1  4 the federal government by the United States Constitution; and
  1  5    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That this Resolution serves as a
  1  6 notice and demand to the federal government, as Iowa's agent,
  1  7 to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are
  1  8 beyond the scope of the federal government's constitutionally
  1  9 delegated powers; and
  1 10    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That copies of this Resolution be
  1 11 transmitted to the President of the United States, the Speaker
  1 12 of the United States House of Representatives, the President
  1 13 of the United States Senate, all of the members of Iowa's
  1 14 congressional delegation and the Governor. 
  1 15                           EXPLANATION
  1 16    This resolution asserts the state's claim under the 10th
  1 17 Amendment to the United States Constitution to all powers not
  1 18 enumerated and granted to the federal government by the
  1 19 Constitution.  The resolution also demands that the federal
  1 20 government cease taking actions which infringe upon Iowa's
  1 21 rights under the 10th Amendment.  Finally, the resolution
  1 22 directs that copies of the resolution be sent to the President
  1 23 of the United States, the Speaker of the United States House
  1 24 of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate,
  1 25 Iowa's congressional delegation, and the Governor. 
  1 26 LSB 1671SS 76
  1 27 mk/cf/24


--Oldyoti

"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom;
and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more,
it will lose that, too."
~Somerset Maugham

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"
JTCoyoté
    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #28 on: February 27, 2009, 11:19:30 am »

Quote from:  link=topic=4199.msg517233#msg517233 date=1235755170
Now, Minnesota weighs in with this Sovereignty Resolution. Thanks jofortruth...  ;D

H.F. No. 997,  as introduced - 86th Legislative Session (2009-2010)   Posted on Feb 19, 2009

1.1A resolution
1.2memorializing the federal government to halt its practice of imposing mandates upon
1.3the states for purposes not enumerated by the Constitution of the United States and
1.4affirming Minnesota's sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of
1.5the United States.
1.6WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as
1.7follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it
1.8to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people;" and
1.9WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that
1.10specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and
1.11WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal
1.12government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and
1.13WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal
1.14government; and
1.15WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment
1.16to the Constitution of the United States; and
1.17WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112
1.18S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory
1.19processes of the states; and
1.20WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending
1.21from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the
1.22United States; NOW, THEREFORE,
2.1BE IT RESOLVED by the Legislature of the State of Minnesota that it urges the President
2.2and the Congress of the United States to halt the federal government's practice of imposing
2.3mandates upon the states for purposes not enumerated by the Constitution of the United States,
2.4and that it affirms Minnesota's sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the
2.5United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by
2.6the Constitution of the United States.
2.7BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota is
2.8directed to prepare copies of this memorial and transmit them to the President of the United
2.9States, the President and the Secretary of the United States Senate, the Speaker and the Clerk of
2.10the United States House of Representatives, the chair of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary,
2.11the chair of the House Committee on the Judiciary, and Minnesota's Senators and Representatives
2.12in Congress.

https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0997.0.html&session=ls86
http://wdoc.house.leg.state.mn.us/leg/LS86/HF0997.0.pdf

JTCoyoté

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims
may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under
robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.
The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity
may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us
for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so
with the approval of their own conscience.
"
~C.S. Lewis

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2009, 10:44:57 am »

From jofortruth who continues to strike sovereignty pay-dirt.

VIRGINIA DECLARES STATE SOVEREIGNTY!

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?091+ful+HR61

089534676
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 61
Offered February 26, 2009
Honoring state sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
----------

Patrons-- Peace, Fralin, Byron, Cline, Cole, Gilbert, Landes, Lingamfelter, Marshall, R.G., Morgan, Ware, R.L. and Wright
----------
Referred to Committee on Rules
----------

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people"; and

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, the states today are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

WHEREAS, many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state of the United States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and

WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 4 says that “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican form of government,” and the Ninth Amendment states that ”The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”; and

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations, and other proposals that may be anticipated, may further violate the Constitution of the United States; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, That the Congress of the United States be urged to honor state sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.  The Commonwealth of Virginia hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.  The Commonwealth by this resolution serves notice to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.  Further, the Commonwealth urges that all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding shall be prohibited or repealed.

Virginia is not new to this sovereignty movement, here is their resolution from 1995.

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 633
Memorializing Congress to observe the 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Agreed to by the House of Delegates, February 4, 1995
Agreed to by the Senate, February 21, 1995

WHEREAS, the 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States clearly limits the powers of the federal government by stating that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people"; and

WHEREAS, the debate over the powers of the federal government in relation to the several states has raged throughout our history, but the recent actions of the federal government, particularly in the area of unfunded mandates, have rekindled the controversy; and

WHEREAS, state authority has been eroded primarily by (i) federal assumption of powers reserved to the states under the 10th Amendment; (ii) unreasonable interpretations of the "commerce clause" that authorize federal pre-emption with respect to any issue that has any faint or circuitous connection to interstate commerce; (iii) constant threats of withholding, withdrawing, or diverting federal funds to coerce compliance with federal practices; and (iv) failure on the part of the states to challenge federal intrusion, while at the same time showing passive endorsement of federal usurpation by seeking federal funding and by accepting federal delegations of power; and

WHEREAS, that vision of federalism, with the states retaining those powers not specifically delegated by the Constitution to the federal government, has been subverted by an insolvent federal government that imposes increasingly onerous and costly mandates on the states; and

WHEREAS, the assault by the Congress of the United States on the 10th Amendment showing no signs of abating, the time for the states to exert their constitutional rights has come; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, the Senate concurring, That Congress be urged to observe the 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The Commonwealth of Virginia hereby claims sovereignty under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution; and, be it

RESOLVED FURTHER, That this resolution serve as the Commonwealth of Virginia's notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of its constitutionally delegated powers; and, be it

RESOLVED FINALLY, That the Clerk of the House of Delegates transmit copies of this resolution to the President of the United States, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, the Attorney General of Virginia, and the members of the Virginia Congressional Delegation so that they may be apprised of the sense of the General Assembly of Virginia.

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?951+ful+HJ633ER



--Oldyoti

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to
our liberties than standing armies..... The issuing powers
should be taken from the banks and restored to the people
to whom it properly belongs."

~Thomas Jefferson

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #30 on: March 05, 2009, 02:18:12 pm »

Jofortruth, you are a researching machine!  ;D

Here is South Dakota's 2009 State Sovereignty Resolution.

State of South Dakota
EIGHTY-FOURTH SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 2009
930Q0793
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION  NO.  1013

 
Introduced by: Representatives Steele, Bolin, Brunner, Carson, Cronin, Curd, Cutler,
Deadrick, Dreyer, Engels, Greenfield, Hamiel, Hoffman, Hunt, Jensen,
Juhnke, Kirkeby, Kopp, Krebs, Lange, Lederman, McLaughlin, Moser,
Noem, Novstrup (David), Olson (Betty), Olson (Ryan), Peters, Putnam,
Rausch, Rave, Romkema, Rounds, Russell, Schlekeway, Sly, Solum,
Tidemann, Van Gerpen, Vanneman, Verchio, Wink, and Wismer and
Senators Novstrup (Al), Adelstein, Bartling, Fryslie, Gant, Garnos, Gray,
Hansen (Tom), Haverly, Howie, Hunhoff (Jean), Maher, Nelson, Olson
(Russell), Peterson, Rhoden, and Schmidt

1  A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Reasserting sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to
 
2 the Constitution of the United States over certain powers and serving notice to the federal
 
3government to cease and desist certain mandates.
 
4  WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as
 
5 follows:
 
6 "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to
 
7 the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and
 
8  WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that
 
9 specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more and the scope of power
 
10 defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states
 
11 specifically to be an agent of the states; and

1  WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal
 
2 government and many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the
 
3 Constitution of the United States; and
 
4  WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112
 
5 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory
 
6 processes of the states; and
 
7  WHEREAS, any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President
 
8 of the United States of America, or Judicial Order by the judicatories of the United States of
 
9 America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of the United States of
 
10 America by the Constitution of the United States of America and which serves to diminish the
 
11 liberty of any of the several states or their citizens constitutes a nullification of the Constitution 

12 of the United States of America by the government of the United States of America; and
 
13  WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending
 
14 from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the
 
15 United States:
 
16  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the House of Representatives of the Eighty-
 
17 fourth Legislature of the State of South Dakota, the Senate concurring therein, that the State of
 
18 South Dakota hereby reasserts sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of
 
19 the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal
 
20 government by the Constitution of the United States; and
 
21  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to
 
22 comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass
 
23 legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed; and
 
24  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this concurrent resolution serve as Notice and Demand

1 to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates
 
2 that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.



http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2009/Bills/HCR1013P.pdf

Oldyoti

"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize,
and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert
their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article
[the Second Amendment] in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
~Trence Coxe, "Remarks on the First part of the Amendments
to the Federal Constitution", "A Pennsylvanian" is his pseudonym
in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, 18 June 1789

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #31 on: March 05, 2009, 02:37:31 pm »

Here is Idaho's 2009 State Sovereignty Resolution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 3
BY STATE AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

1 A JOINT MEMORIAL

2 TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES

3 IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED, AND TO THE CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION

4 REPRESENTING THE STATE OF IDAHO IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED

5 STATES.

6 We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho

7 assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixtieth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully

8 represent that:

9 WHEREAS, the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution does not simply

10 provide for a collective right or a right for the states to establish militias; rather it provides for

11 the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and

12 WHEREAS, the primary purpose of the right to keep and bear arms is to protect one’s

13 self, family and possessions from either the private lawlessness of other persons or the tyranny

14 of government; and

15  WHEREAS, the right to keep and bear arms is also meant to protect the general private

16 uses of firearms in activities such as hunting and other sporting activities; and

17  WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller, 128

18 S.Ct. 2783 (2008), recently struck down a firearms ban in the District of Columbia, explicitly

19 ruling that the Second Amendment protects the right of the people to possess firearms for pri­

20 vate use; and

21 WHEREAS, despite this ruling, legislation has been introduced in the United States

22 House of Representatives calling for a system of mandatory federal licensing of all firearm

23 owners; and

24 WHEREAS, the legislation introduced would require all firearm owners to apply for and
 
25 carry a federally issued picture identification in order to keep any firearm in their homes; and
 
26  WHEREAS, the legislation introduced would make it a federal crime to keep a loaded
 
27 firearm or an unloaded firearm and ammunition within any premises including, under certain
 
28 circumstances, American homes where a child may be present; and
 
29 WHEREAS, the legislation introduced specifically purports to preempt any state or local
 
30 law inconsistent with it; and
 
31  WHEREAS, the introduced legislation, Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale
 
32 Act of 2009, is a direct imposition on each American’s individual right to keep and bear arms
 
33 in their homes and for their protection.
 
34  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the First Regular Session of
 
35 the Sixtieth Idaho Legislature, the House of Representatives and the Senate concurring therein,
 
36 that members of the United States Congress cease and desist attempting to enact federal leg­
 
37 islation impinging on the individual right of every American to keep and bear arms in any
 
38 manner. Specifically, that members of Congress oppose the passage of the Firearm Licensing
 
39 and Record of Sale Act of 2009, and any similar legislation.


1  BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the Senate be, and she is hereby
 
2 authorized and directed to forward a copy of this Memorial to the President of the Senate and
 
3 the Speaker of the House of Representatives of Congress, and the congressional delegation
 
4 representing the State of Idaho in the Congress of the United States.



http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2009/HJM003.pdf

JTCoyoté

"The price of liberty is, always has been, and always
will be blood: The person who is not willing to die for
his liberty has already lost it to the first scoundrel
who is willing to risk dying to violate that person's
liberty!  Are you free?"

~Andrew Ford

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"
JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #32 on: March 05, 2009, 05:33:02 pm »


Route24, thanks for finding this one... ;)



http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:C_UZPA5Ni6QJ:www.lrc.ky.gov/record/09RS/HC168/bill.doc+HCR+168&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

This is the html version of the file http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/09RS/HC168/bill.doc.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.

UNOFFICIAL COPY AS OF 0/0/00 09 REG. SESS. 09 RS BR 1602

    A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION claiming sovereignty over powers not granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution; serving notice to the federal government to cease mandates beyond its authority; and stating Kentucky's position that federal legislation that requires states to comply under threat of loss of federal funding should be prohibited or repealed.
    WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited to it by the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and
    WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and
    WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the state; and
    WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and
    WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
    WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution states that "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..." and the Ninth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."; and
    WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and
    WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States;
    NOW, THEREFORE,
Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Senate concurring therein:

    âSection 1.   The Commonwealth of Kentucky hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.
    âSection 2.   This Resolution serves as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.
    âSection 3.   It is the position of the Commonwealth of Kentucky that all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions, or requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed.
    âSection 4.   The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall distribute a copy of this Resolution to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate of each state's legislature of the United States of America, and to each member of Kentucky's congressional delegation.
Page of 2

BR160200.100-1602


JTCoyoté

"Property: Rightful dominion over external objects; ownership;
the unrestricted and exclusive right to a thing; Property is
the highest right a man can have to anything."

~Black's Law Dictionary Second Edition, 1891
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #33 on: March 07, 2009, 04:00:55 am »

Quote from:  link=topic=4199.msg528826#msg528826 date=1236420055
Once a State has sent the feds their resolve to abide by the Constitution, then they began the process for Constitutional amendment review to bring federal amendments past and proposed into line with Constitutional guidelines reserved to the state by the Constitution. This is the third piece of legislation that sets up the endgame against federal tyranny. This legislation can be tasked to review the constitutionality of all past federal legislation affecting the State. This would also include all amendments to the national Constitution.

The first move in the process is The State Sovereignty Resolution, then The State Sovereignty Act, and then The State Constitutional Amendment Review Commission Resolution, to review any attempts at a CON-CON, a race that we are in now, as was the case 15 years ago, "Sovereignty vs CON-CON." This commission is created by a resolution such as the one below from the State of California.


Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 57
 
Introduced by Senator Rogers
March 21, 1996
 
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 57—Relative to the
United States Constitution.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SCR 57, as introduced, Rogers.

Constitutional
amendments: commission.
This measure would establish a commission to make
determinations on specified questions relating to
amendments to, and procedures guaranteed by, the United
States Constitution, and to report its determinations to the
Legislature no later than January 1, 1998. It would resolve that
upon submission of the report, the commission would be
abolished.

Fiscal committee: no.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

1 WHEREAS, It has become increasingly clear that
2 members of our federal government, both past and
3 present, have acted to destroy the sovereignty of the State
4 of California and to subvert the Constitution of the United
5 States, a fact attested to by the United States Senate’s
6 Report No. 93-549, wherein we find: ‘‘This vast range of
7 [presidential emergency] powers ... confer enough
8 authority to rule the country without reference to normal
9 constitutional processes,’’ and the Williamsburg Resolve,
10 drafted at the Republican Governors Conference of 1994,
11 which states: ‘‘Federal action has exceeded the clear
12 bounds of the Constitution’’; and

2

1 WHEREAS, There is strong evidence suggesting that
2 one such action by those in our federal government may
3 be their having announced the ratification of, and having
4 implemented, several constitutional amendments whose
5 results are diametrically opposed to constitutional intent,
6 and the liberty our founding fathers sought for
7 Americans, even though the amendments were never
8 properly ratified; and
9 WHEREAS, A comparative analysis of the principles
10 and procedures set forth in the Declaration of
11 Independence and the United States Constitution and
12 the operation of our nation reveals a serious departure
13 from those principles and procedures; and
14 WHEREAS, The initiation and continuation of these
15 policies, and the legislation in support of them is the result
16 of the emergency powers of the President enacted in
17 1933, and constitutional amendments that are
18 inconsistent with the spirit and intent of our nation’s
19 founders; and
20 WHEREAS, The general and complete disarmament
21 program being carried out today under Public Law 87-297
22 will soon result in the United States being unable to
23 defend itself should Americans decide to return their
24 government to within the limits prescribed by the United
25 States Constitution; now, therefore, be it
26 Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, the
27 Assembly thereof concurring, That the Legislature of the
28 State of California hereby establishes a commission to
29 make determinations on the following:
30  (a) Why the United States Senate, in its Report No.
31 93-549, said that ‘‘freedoms and governmental
32 procedures guaranteed by the Constitution’’ have been
33 ‘‘abridged’’ since 1933.
34  (b) Whether the federal government intends to
35 repeal the emergency powers of the President and
36 reinstate the United States Constitution as the supreme
37 law of the land, and if not, the action required by the
38 states to ensure that its agent takes that action promptly.
39  (c) Whether Amendments 11 to 26, inclusive, to the
40 United States Constitution were properly ratified, and[/color]

3

1 the impact these amendments have had on the operation
2 of our nation.
3  (d) Whether there are any constitutional
4 amendments that were properly ratified, but
5 subsequently removed without due process; and be it
6 further
7 Resolved, That the commission be composed of
8 members appointed by the Joint Rules Committee
9 necessary to carry out the duties and mission of the
10 commission, with a chairperson and vice chairperson to
11 be appointed by the Joint Rules Committee; and be it
12 further
13 Resolved, That any expenses incurred by the
14 commission in carrying out its duties shall be paid from
15 the respective operating funds of the Senate and the
16 Assembly, to be disbursed upon direction of the Joint
17 Rules Committee; and be it further
18 Resolved, That the commission report its
19 determinations to the Legislature no later than January
20 1, 1998; and be it further
21 Resolved, That upon submission of the report the
22 commission shall be abolished.

*************

JTCoyoté

"The Law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it!
The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an
entirely contrary purpose! The law became the weapon of every kind of greed!
Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!
If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral duty requires me to call the attention
of my fellow-citizens to it."
~Frédéric Bastiat, from "The Law", 1850

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #34 on: March 12, 2009, 04:32:36 pm »

Then there is this from "freedomrik"...

I need All Patriot and Truthers from NC to write their NC reps. and urge them to pass HR 571
Find contact info for your Reps at http://www.ncleg.net/GIS/RandR07/Home.html

Help me revive this Resolution.........


North Carolina's 1995 10th Amendment State Sovereignty Resolution



GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA

SESSION 1995

H2

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 571

Committee Substitute Favorable 5/3/95

–––––––––––––––––––-

Sponsors:

–––––––––––––––––––-

Referred to:

–––––––––––––––––––-

March 28, 1995

 

A JOINT RESOLUTION DEMANDING THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CEASE AND DESIST MANDATES THAT ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF ITS CONSTITUTIONALLY DELEGATED POWERS AND HONORING THE MEMORY OF RICHARD DOBBS SPAIGHT, WILLIAM BLOUNT, AND HUGH WILLIAMSON.

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people."; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the United States Constitution and no more; and

Whereas, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

Whereas, in 1995, the states are in fact treated as agents of the federal government; and

Whereas, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

Whereas, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, Richard Dobbs Spaight, William Blount, and Hugh Williamson were among North Carolina's delegates to the federal convention in 1787 and signed the United States Constitution on behalf of North Carolina; and

Whereas, Richard Dobbs Spaight was a member of the Continental Congress from 1783 to 1785; a member of the House of Commons of the Assemblies of 1779, 1781, 1782, 1783, 1786-87, 1792; a member of the Senate of the Assemblies of 1801 and 1802; Speaker of the House of Commons of the Assembly of 1785; Governor, as chosen by the legislature, from 1792-95; and a member of the United States House of Representatives in the Fifth and Sixth Congresses; and

Whereas, William Blount was a member of the Continental Congress, elected in 1782, 1784, and 1785; a member of the House of Commons of the Assemblies of 1780, 1783, 1784, 1784-85, 1788, 1789, 1801, 1802; a member of the Senate of the Assembly of 1806; and Speaker of the North Carolina House of Commons of the Assembly of 1784-85; and

Whereas, Hugh Williamson was a member of the Continental Congress, elected in 1782, 1784, and 1787; a member of the House of Commons of the Assemblies of 1782 and 1785; and a member of the First Congress of the United States House of Representatives;

Now, therefore, be it resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

Section 1.  That the State of North Carolina claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all other powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution.

Sec. 2.  That this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government, as the State of North Carolina's agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of its constitutionally delegated powers.

Sec. 3.  That the General Assembly hereby honors the life and memory of Richard Dobbs Spaight, William Blount, and Hugh Williamson for their service and contributions to this State and the United States and for their signing of the Constitution of our United States.

Sec. 4.  The Secretary of State shall transmit copies of this resolution to the President of the United States, the Vice President of the United States, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate of each state legislature of the United States, and each Senator and Representative in the Congress of the United States from North Carolina.

Sec. 5.  This resolution is effective upon ratification.


JTCoyoté

"I am absolutely opposed to a national ID card.
This is a total contradiction of what a free society
is all about. The purpose of government is to protect
the secrecy and the privacy of all individuals, not the
secrecy of government. We don't need a national ID card."
~Ron Paul

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2009, 12:51:30 pm »

Tennessee is on board as well, and I want to thank "Route24" for alerting us to it, and thanks also to "Jofortruth", who's doing yeomans research and ferreted out the document on this... check out Jo's list...  http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=6267


Tennessee: HJR0108 (Lynn) Filed for Introduction 02/18/2009
http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=HJR0108
http://susan-lynn.blogspot.com/2009/02/hjr-108-state-sovereignty.html
http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/billinfo/BillSummaryArchive.aspx?BillNumber=HJR0104
&ga=106
 
QUOTE 
*HJR 0108 by *Lynn, Maggart, Hawk, Niceley, Swafford, Campfield, Haynes,
Watson, Dunn, Eldridge, Coley, Bell, Floyd, Mumpower, Cobb J, Casada, Hill,
Dennis, Evans, Rich. 
Memorials, Congress - Urges Congress to recognize Tennessee's sovereignty under
the tenth amendment to the Constitution. -
 
QUOTE 
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 108
By Lynn
 
A RESOLUTION to affirm Tennessee's sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to
the Constitution of the United States and to demand the federal government halt its
practice of assuming powers and of imposing mandates upon the states for
purposes not enumerated by the Constitution of the United States.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as
follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the
people"; and
 
WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being
that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and
 
WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the
federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states;
and
 
WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the
federal government; and
 
WHEREAS, many powers assumed by the federal government and federal mandates
are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States; and
 
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United
States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the
legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and
 
WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now
pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the
Constitution of the United States; now, therefore,
 
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ONE
HUNDRED
SIXTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, THE SENATE
CONCURRING, that we hereby affirm Tennessee's sovereignty under the Tenth
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise
enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United
States. We also demand the federal government to halt and reverse its practice of
assuming powers and of imposing mandates upon the states for purposes not
enumerated by the Constitution of the United States.
 
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a committee of conference and correspondence
be
appointed by the Speaker of the House and of the Senate, which shall have as its
charge to communicate the preceding resolution to the legislatures of the several
states, to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship
and to call for a joint working group between the states to enumerate the abuses of
authority by the federal government and to seek repeal of the assumption of powers
and the imposed mandates.
 
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be transmitted
to
the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the
Speaker and the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, and to each
member of Tennessee's Congressional delegation.[/color]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Another Bill HJR 0104 by *Campfield, Rich has also been introduced)

*******************************************************

JTCoyoté

"A popular government without popular information
or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to
a farce, or a tragedy, or perhaps both."

~James Madison
 
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #36 on: March 23, 2009, 02:25:00 pm »


But you can't deny what that last paragraph in the New Hampshire resolution contained, which was passed, and Georgia has a bill with that paragraph in it pending as well.  The wording cannot be construed as anything but advocating secession.  Sure, the resolution is a great bill, but that one paragraph ruins the entire thing.
Actually New Hampshires didn't passed, it was ITL'd by a margin of just over 30 votes. The outrage in the gallery was staggering. Prople shouting death threats to the floor, in unison reciting article 10 of the New Hampshire state constitution (right of revolution),many in the gallery were armed and open carrying. It was pure pandemonium and damn near an armed coup. the public support for this resolution was massive and yet many legislators ignored that and voted to kill it out of cowardess.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DECLARES SOVEREIGNTY
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html
HCR 6 – AS INTRODUCED
2009 SESSION
09-0274
09/01
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

(...)

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and

That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature.

JTCoyoté

"All government without the consent of the governed
is the very definition of slavery."

~Jonathan Swift

The part that I put in bold in that quote completely ruins the entire resolution, and i bring that up because my state has a copy of this resolution pending as we speak.  This makes me weary of COINTELPRO, advocating secession at the slightest infringement of our sovereign Constitution.  I figured of all people JTCoyote would be the one to address this.

http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/fulltext/hr470.htm


Your bolded clause above is precisely why this resolution continues to be defeated. This portion smacks strongly of secessionist sentiment and points directly away from the lawful process that the 10th Amendment State Sovereignty Movement is designed to create.

As I have pointed out before, there is a procedure for using the 10th Amendment to reign in Federal grabs for power; a specific set of steps that must be followed in order to satisfy lawful service. The way I described this is much like the final moves in a chess game. The 10th Amendment Resolution puts the federal government on notice that their king in check; resulting from their unlawful moves in the form of Executive Orders, Federal mandated programs and other federal power grabs. With this Resolution, they are notified that their "king" is in danger.

The resolution demands that the federal agent prove by chapter and verse, to the satisfaction of the state, the constitutionality of their federal mandated laws and programs. The state by this action has voted intent to exercise their 10th Amendment VETO.

Once 38 of the 50 states have independently informed the federal government of this, intent to do some housecleaning, the feds can push to continue their little game... or they can resign it. If they choose to continue, then the states independently put forth a Constitutional State Sovereignty Act. This bill of law is enacted within the state, and emphasizes that the state no longer recognizes power exerted by the federal government that has not been determined by the state legislature to be within the prescribed parameters set by the Organic Constitution regarding federal power. This shuts down all federal power within the state over and above that which the state itself determines by law, to be allowed by the Constitution.

This opens to state scrutiny, all federally enacted power, including all Constitutional Amendments and subsequent statutory interpretations that have been enacted since the ratification of the organic Constitution on December 15, 1791. In effect... "Checkmate!" The feds game is over. The states would start doing again what they haven't done the 1820's namely apply 10th Amendment medicine to federally mandated laws.

By adhering strictly to the organic Constitution for the United States of America and the Bill of Rights as ratified in convention on December 15, 1791, as the basis of and reason for this inquiry under the letter of the 10th Amendment, necessitating why the 1791 ratified Constitution SHALL, and must remain untouched as the supreme Law of the Land; it is the home of the 10th Amendment and law empowering the 10th Amendment in this complaint against the federal government. In so doing, the movement remains Constitutionally lawful by protecting the Organic Constitution itself.

Secession, or the breaking away of any state, or any state making this a call for a constitutional amendment, or God forbid a constitutional convention which would spell disaster by opening up the Organic Constitution to changes which CANNOT BE CONTROLLED.


The upshot is these state resolutions, and each of the sovereignty acts, must be done within the state alone and not by some convention. I'm sure you all understand why. The flurry of constitutional amendments that exploded from 1865 until the present day, are precisely the method that has been used by the globalist rogue government provocateurs to, slowly engorge the Federal Government with unconstitutional power to exploit the states and the people and render us debtors and paupers in the richest land on planet Earth.

The Bill of Rights begins it's enumeration with the 1st Amendment and the phrase, "Congress shall make no law..." By the time of the nefarious and usurping 16th amendment... amendments begin with or contain the phrase, "Congress shall have power..." This shows how the globalists had complete control at this time to grow the federal government at the expense of the people, and with the passage of the 17th amendment they succeeded at removing all representation from states at the federal level."

As has been correctly pointed out here, there is latent secession-ism, as you have shown, in the New Hampshire resolution. The secessionists as I have stated before, are a provocateur group.  They have their roots reaching back to before the Civil War. The object of their provocateuring is to stop any lawful 10th amendment movement within the states aimed at reigning in Federal power, and twist it into an unlawful secessionist movement. If someone says they are for secession... then they are a Global/FED, whether they know it or not.

JTCoyoté

"...the State of Colorado hereby claims sovereignty, under the 10th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, over all powers
not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by
the United States Constitution."
~From HJR-94-1035, The First
10th Amendment State Sovereignty Resolution, 1994
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"
JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #37 on: March 27, 2009, 10:25:20 am »


If the states refuse to recognize that the Federal Government has any power whatsoever, then what is the difference between that and secession?  If there is no unifying buffer that connects the states, then they truly are separate nations.  Don't you think that instead of totally refusing to accept the Federal Government as legitimate, that the states instead should begin the process of nullifying any law or mandate that they deem unconstitutional by consensus.  Then, after doing so, they begin the process of trying, or calling for the trial of, the people who commited this form of treason by excersising powers that they were never delegated.

I will assume what you are referring to here, is the bolded portion of the New Hampshire resolution. As I pointed out in the first paragraph of my last post, this is exactly why the New Hampshire resolution is constantly being defeated. It is because it contains secessionist language. As do a couple of other state resolutions that have used New Hampshire as a model.

In the third paragraph of my above post, I show the next step if the feds do not cease and desist upon receipt of the resolution...

"If they choose to continue, then the states put forth the Constitutional State
Sovereignty Act. This bill of law is enacted within the state, and emphasizes
that the state no longer recognizes any power exerted by the federal
government, that has not been determined by the state legislature to be
within the prescribed parameters set by the Constitution regarding federal power.

Thus it shall not, and therefore cannot become law within the state."

In my last post, I boiled down into one page, the entire process and procedure that must be adhered to in order to obtain lawful service and remedy. It worked well in the 90's, in getting these passed, before the unlawful false flag of OKC deflected and diverted the movement until now.  My last post would be well worth reading and rereading in order to understand why state legislatures are rightfully leery of signing on to legislation such as New Hampshire's.

The process of law is clear, for both sides, thus must be adhered to by both sides, and most assuredly by our side. The bottom line on New Hampshire's resolution is one of secession, and as long as that clause remains within the body of that resolution, it will not pass -- and of right should not pass!

JTCoyoté

"It [the Market Crash of 1929] was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence....
The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they
might emerge as rulers of us all."
~ Rep. Lewis T. McFadden (R-PA)
Chairman of the House banking and finance committee (1920-31)
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"


JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #38 on: March 27, 2009, 10:26:44 am »


Ok that clears it up for me, but i still have one question.

You say the states, after passing this Constitutional Sovereignty Act, are responsible for approving Federal actions before they are done.  Is that not unconstitutional in and of itself?  The only time the states can lawfully come together to make decisions without the involvement of the Federal Government is during the Constitutional Convention process, which we all know would be just as dangerous or even more so than secession itself. 

"No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay."

The Federal Government, I believe, is entitled to its powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and those powers cannot be lawfully taken away or "approved" by anyone, without a Constitutional Amendment.  That said, I agree with you that the States are able, individually, to nullify, with proof, any act of Congress, executive, or judicial order that may be reaching beyond its Constitutionally granted powers.  However, they CANNOT have the power to approve or dissaprove forcefully of a legitimate Act of the Federal Government.  It would be beyond the States' power to do so.

Your first paragraph:

The Constitutional State Sovereignty Act enforces with actual law, the sovereignty resolution, it provides teeth. The resolution was created out of necessity, upon seeing that the federal government is mandating acts upon the state that are unconstitutional. The resolution informs the federal government that the state is aware of the 9th and 10th amendments of the Constitution, ratified in convention on December 15, 1791. The state understands the meaning of these two amendments, and it's power under them. Thus, of necessity, the state wishes to inform the federal government that it must, by law, abide by these two amendments with regard to its dealings with the state.

Once the process of Resolution has been accomplished, if the federal government fails to act upon that information by curtailing its barrage of unconstitutional mandates, then the state must by law take the next step which is to pass a law mandating to the satisfaction of the state legislature, (the lawmaking body of the state -- therefore the body that would be enacting into state law any federal government mandates), that the federal government now show chapter and verse from the Constitution where any and all federal mandates foisted upon the states, past and/or present are constitutional, as the state may require.

Once there are 38 states, each doing this independently, within the body of their legislature. Then the Federal downsizing begins.  Each state has the right to question not only the mandate itself, but any precedent, any amendment, or any federal statute that the federal government may cite, regarding its constitutionality. So there will be no convention nor need for one, since the states will not be conferring with one another at the same time as would be the case with a convention, yet each would independently be in direct communication with the federal power. It would be just like normal legislative procedure within each state, with the difference that each state would have the federal government's attention for a change. Thereby, the state, and the people of that state, engage and preserve their rights and powers as guaranteed under the 9th and 10th amendments.

Your second paragraph...

Is from article 1 section 10 of the Constitution. The term compact here refers to any extra-constitutional compacts. What is being engaged in here, is protected by the 10th amendment, a constitutional re-affirmation communication that is being independently engaged in within the legislatures of each state. If I were to use your definition, as I infer it, of what this means, then the Constitution itself would be unconstitutional because it is a compact between the state's. This particular clause deals with anything in the compact vein that isn't protected by constitution. The annual State Governors conference would be much closer to an extra-constitutional compact, than the 50 states independently within their respective legislative processes, holding the federal government's feet to the constitutional fire using the 10th amendment as the precedent.

Your third paragraph:

There is already a constitutional amendment... it is called the 10th amendment. And the federal government does not have the right or the power to force an unconstitutional federal law upon any one, or any number of the states. The states have the absolute right and power within the Constitution, through their legislative body, to demand a demonstration of constitutionality for every federally mandated law without exception. And if 38 states independently by a vote of their legislatures find a particular federal law unconstitutional as it stacks up to the Organic Law... then it is unconstitutional... This absolutely requires that the Organic Constitution for the United States of America and The Bill of Rights, as ratified in convention, in the City of New York on December 15, 1791, be re-affirmed and upheld as the undeniable Law of the Land and final arbiter of constitutionality.

The federal government is being put on notice that they now must prove "legitimacy", given their unconstitutional activity of late. This has glaringly come to the attention of the states, and thus, reigning it in, which is the states prerogative, would be timely now, if not long overdue. The federal government is being informed that it is now under close state observation, regarding all it's shenanigans of power grabbing far beyond its constitutionally prescribed boundaries, and it must cease and desist this activity now, or "...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security..."  In other words, the federal agent will be fired.

JTCoyoté

''...on every question of construction [of the Constitution], let us carry
ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the
spirit manifested in the Debates, & instead of trying what meaning may be
squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one
in which it was passed.''
~Thomas Jefferson
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #39 on: March 28, 2009, 02:23:59 am »


Alright, I understand what you mean now.  The state legislatures have the right collectively to demand proof of the constitutionality of any Federal Law. 

But, you profess to be what I would interpret as a champion of the United States Constitution, and yet you believe that the government established therein should be "fired."  That is a very powerful, yet obscure thing to say, as it can be interpreted in many different ways.  When you say "the Federal Government will be fired", do you mean you are advocating the restructuring of the government, under a new constitution?  Do you support the idea in a few of these emerging resolutions, that "all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually"? 

If you do, then I ask you, what do you believe could possibly be a better framework of Government than the one that we now currently live under?  In my opinion, the founders of our nation created the most brilliant document in human history, and I will never support the trashing of it as long as I live.  Here is a little blog I wrote on the Campaign for Liberty about this very topic:  http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=13774


If you don't support this form of quasi-secession, then more power to you.

The governmental structure of the federal agent is fine as it is set out in the Constitution... but that is not the structure, nor is it the Government that now rides ruff-shod over the states and the people in our time... The best way to say it, and truer words were never spoken no matter your opinion of the man that spoke them.  This was said on the campaign trail in Columbus Ohio on Sept. 16th and 17th 1859...

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress
and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but
to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

--Abraham Lincoln

If you have been reading my posts, you will notice that I am emphatic about adherence to the 1791, convention ratified, Constitution for the United States of America and the Bill of Rights. I also like the amendments that had been proposed and ratified before 1820, and the original 14th Amendment, but became the 13th Amendment after the original 13th disappeared mysteriously from the Amendments.

With that said, in other threads I have laid out the shenanigans of subterfuge used by the royalist globalists and their minions to undermine these United States, they finally plunged us into civil war, and then consolidated their power by a parallel government corporation, artfully created by the DC organic act of 1871... These moves created the unprecedented power in the hands of the federal agent to create corporate agencies that operate outside of the normal constitutional boundaries of the government as it was originally laid out by the 1791 Constitution.

I am not familiar with what the Campaign for Liberty has in mind, but I will look into it. As to the power reverting back to the states... the power never left the states. We still have the power.  As a united front of states, by a super majority we can remove all unconstitutional laws, the states have the power to eviscerate the entirety of the corporate parallel government, and bring charges against all those engaged in this rampant treason in the District of Columbia, and bring them to justice. All the while, keeping those necessary agencies of necessary federal operation in working order under new more responsive, constitutional abiding people. People who take an oath to the Constitution for the United States of America and then uphold it.

The founding fathers, many of them still at the helm, when the real original 13th amendment was proposed, and then ratified, foresaw the days we are now in, and sought to avert them with this Amendment. Once Jackson killed the second national Bank, the Crown tripled its efforts in undermining subterfuge to the undoing of our Constitution and had great success by provocateuring both sides, creating the Civil War.

The utilization of the 10th amendment within the states, up until the time of the Civil War, was the constitutional litmus used in proving a federal law or mandate before became law within the state. That all changed after the Civil War however, and the 10th amendment was demonized as being the cause for the secession of the Southern states. Nothing could be further from the truth. The 10th Amendment requires the Constitution, and the nine preceding articles of Amendment in the Bill of Rights, remain in tact as the power behind it.

The 10th Amendment has nothing to do with secession by the way. Since to secede would mean to break the constitutional contract the 10th Amendment is part of with the other states. Everyone knows you cannot be protected by a contract you have broken. The state that secedes is not protected by any part of the contract. Therefore the 10th Amendment Resolution movement is a Constitutional restoration movement and the opposite of a secessionist movement.

Contrary to popular belief the Constitution is not a federal document, it creates and spells out federal power, but it is POWER that is delegated in the Constitution, sent by the people through the states... whereby, in dealings at law within statehouses, the state constitution holds the specifics for that state's government. However, the Constitution for the united States, lays out the General organic law that must be upheld through the states by this agreement. Thus the people and the states as a whole hold all power while the federal agency has only that power spelled out in the Constitution, because the federal government itself is CREATED by the Constitution.

Therefore, it's time we the people and the several States start exercising our rights and power lest we lose it forever into the hands of those who have taken our lawful agent, engorged it with power it has unlawfully wrenched from us and is at this moment handing it over to our historical longtime enemies, the usury Banking Barons, their Pirate minions, and the tyrannical crowned heads of Europe!

JTCoyoté

"This nation can never be conquered
from without. If it is ever to fall it will
be from within."
~President Abraham Lincoln
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #40 on: March 29, 2009, 03:10:47 am »


But, the States have given up some power to their creation, the Federal Government, and that power cannot be added unto nor taken away without a Constitutional Amendment.  A State, as long as it continues within this agreement, does NOT have the power individually, contrary to what is stated in a few of the sovereignty resolutions, to either remove a power from its delegated position in the Federal Government, or to assume such power to itself.  Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not understand where you get the idea that the States have the power to delete or to delegate more powers to the Federal Government by any form other than a Constitutional Convention.  That, to the extent of my knowledge, is the only way for the States themselves, to amend any powers delegated to the Fed.  The other way is for Congress to propose amendments, or even an entirely new Constitution, and that the States ratify them.

I completely agree with you that many of the dealings within the Federal Government are currently unconstitutional, and that the States collectively have the right to call these acts out, and to nullify them, but I do not believe that the States have any authority to direct the Federal Government in any of its legitimately constitutional actions such as the powers defined in Article 1, Section 8, or any where else in the Constitution of the United States, because they gave up these powers individually in order for the entire country to posess them collectively.

You said that the current government is not legitimately and physically the actual government created by the Constitution?  In what way do you mean this?  Are you saying this with regards to the District of Columbia itself and its jurisdiction, or the actual people who are running it?

The states did not give up the powers enumerated in article I section 8. These powers are merely communicated from the several states, in exchange for value of the equal worth from the central agent. You don't give up your rights to a lawyer when he is hired to represent you, same with the relationship of the federal government and the States... Article IV is an example of some of the exchange goods the States are to receive from the federal agent, with article IV section 4 being particularly noteworthy.

As I've pointed out in one of my earlier "lengthy" posts, several of the states resolutions will not pass because they are not abiding by the rules of lawful service. I'm sure you can surmise what that means, and most state legislators understand what it means as well. In that post I also spelled out the proper procedure.

Your comment:
 
"Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not understand where you get the idea that the states have the power to delete or to delegate more powers to the federal government by any form other than a constitutional convention."

This is a curious statement, it presupposes that the state is deleting power granted by the Constitution, or attempting to delegate powers to the federal government that are not enumerated therein. This is not the case in this movement at all. The 10th Amendment Resolution portends housecleaning only with the broom of Article I Section 8 in hand. Since the powers delegated by the constitutional agreement between the state's are still state powers that have been ceded by provisions in the agreement between the states, to a 3rd party, to the federal agent, we the states have absolute control of that agent and desire that the agent, the federal government, cease the process of voting itself powers that are not specifically within their defined powers to hold.

Much the same way that power of attorney is granted by you to your legal agent. The states by the 10th amendment, still have the power to access and resend, through the individual 10th amendment effort of each state throughout the 50 states, together, without the communication of a convention, but from the laws of necessity, as spelled out in the Declaratory Enabling Act that gave rise to the Constitution namely the Declaration of Independence. 

This knowledge is quite well known among the powerful in Washington DC, who remain silent about it and hedge every bet against it... this is why, when the 10th amendment state sovereignty movement was about to reach a crescendo in the mid-90s, the folks pushing it, those Constitutional patriots, had to be demonized and stopped. The Oklahoma City bombing was engineered precisely by the feds, to take care of this problem.

The reason for the aforementioned housecleaning is pretty obvious, and is apparent to a majority of the states presently. The federal government has been giving unto itself, power at the expense of the states and the people of the states, which it has no constitutional power to grant itself. It is doing so only by deconstruction of word, grammar, and definition, and inventing against the Constitution webs of convolved meaning, beyond the bounds of what an intelligent man can tolerate.

Only the states, and their people have the power, through constitutional process, which includes the 10th amendment process, to rein in an agent who is bent upon the absolute destruction of the principals ( the States), by misuse of the agreement that created it.

So you're above quoted statement seems to me, a bit of a non sequitur given the discussion thus far, at least as far as I have advanced it. I see in it, however, what seems as an attempt at wrenching meanings from my words that are not there at all.

A super majority of the 50 states, by individual initiative, has the power under the 10th amendment to accomplish without convention the opening up of the entire amended law after the date of ratification December 15, 1791, and to reiterate, certainly without a convention.  The only reason for a convention, would be to open the Ratified in Convention 1791 Constitution to change... and that, is what we, this effort, this movement, absolutely, emphatically, and well beyond a shadow of a doubt, DO NOT WANT! NOR WILL WE ACCEPT!!

I will once again refer you to Thomas Jefferson:

''...on every question of construction [of the Constitution], let us carry
ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the
spirit manifested in the Debates, & instead of trying what meaning may be
squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one
in which it was passed.''
~Thomas Jefferson

This is a very important quote that has been ignored by virtually all interpreters of the Constitution, since John Jay was the Chief Justice of the court. Also, as we pull away in time from the date of the framing of this monumental work, more and more people within government, know less and less about the foundation documents, and have mistakenly come to see the federal government as the center of power. This is of course wrong.

It is also the reason why the states must, every 200 years or so clean up the complacent trash that has been gathering around the agreement which they all so honorably signed. This may include firing the attorney and hiring a new one. But the agreement between the states, the Organic Constitution, which is guarded at its conclusion by the 10th amendment of that Constitution and Bill of Rights, will remain. All else is within the 9th and 10th amendment state powers to dissolve or change.


As to the last part of your post dealing with our current rogue federal government operating every minute outside of the Constitution, because of its corporate structure and its sneaky way of utilizing the power of the Constitution without having to abide by the Constitution, I suggest that you read closely the following linked material, then we can discuss it.

Much was weeded through at this link, before we could get to the level in the discussion that leads to the "aha eureka" phenomenon of understanding how the federal slight of hand was accomplished. Here is the link...

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=63062.0

This will help... but it does get rather esoteric in the grasping department, though it is pretty concrete in the factual. It is quite like looking at one of those early holograms that looked like a bunch of dots and squiggles in pastel colors on the paper that you held in the sunlight to see. It was impossible to see at first, until that one time, when it popped out at you... then you never had a problem being able to see it from then on.

JTCoyoté

"A government that is large enough to supply everything
you need is large enough to take everything you have."

~Thomas Jefferson
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

JTCoyoté

    Guest

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #41 on: April 14, 2009, 12:15:42 pm »

Our friend Michael G. has ferreted out this copy of the paper trail of the 1995 MAINE 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolution, from it's introduction to it's adoption on April 11, 1995. Thanks Michael.

Click on the thumbnail images below to read the document full size... Unfortunately, the first 8 images of these documents were lost in a major server crash in June of '11... if anyone out there has them copied, let me know at oldyoti@yahoo.com. ~JT)







JTCoyoté

"...the State of Colorado hereby claims sovereignty, under the 10th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, over all powers
not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by
the United States Constitution."
~From HJR-94-1035, The First
10th Amendment State Sovereignty Resolution, 1994

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

Online JT Coyoté

    Moderator
    Member
    *****
    Posts: 3,619
    "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
        View Profile
        Email
        Personal Message (Online)

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #42 on: September 19, 2010, 10:54:22 am »


Quote from: matt butler
(posted on infowars.com 9/13/10)

matt butler Says:
September 13th, 2010 at 12:15 am

I read this case and have also studied it while in law school and it does not do all the things you imply Mr. Coyote. It stands for the very limited constitutional law that the federal government cannot pass laws pressing State officers and employees into service of the federal government. In the case this meant it was unconstitutional to require county sheriffs to participate in brady background checks on guns. If the feds wanted such checks they had to administer them.


Matt,

It seems you would have us believe that if the feds had sent a small force of agents into each county of every state to administer and enforce the provisions of the Brady Act, that would have been okay. An invasion of agents to enforce federal law, in violation of several constitutional provisions as well as the very spirit of the Declaration of Independence... hmm, that's an interesting take on it.

You fail to mention however that several of the questioned Brady provisions were rendered "obsolete" by Insta-Check, long before the Petition was ever heard by the high court. Therefore it would seem that something more fundamental was driving this appeal as well.

If you take the time to read the 11,400 word Court Opinion by Justice Scalia, and the Concurring Opinions of Justices O'Conner and Thomas, you come away with the understanding that much more is being ruled on here than a few Brady provisions or the idea of federal commandeering of County Sheriffs and other state officials. 

This ruling upholds not only the state's 10th Amendment power and sovereignty, it reinforces the 9th Amendment standing of the people as the very source of state power. This is a masterwork by Scalia, and should be studied a lot deeper than you were instructed to do in law school.

My assertion that much more was on the plate when the Appeal was initiated, is not just a feeling, you must know that I was involved in the 10th Amendment State Sovereignty movement from the beginning at it's birthplace in the Colorado State Capitol.  I am well aware of what Sheriff Mack was up to in 1994/95... hands on.

Here is a snippet from Scalia's Court Opinion that gets to the essentials of the ruling on Printz v. United States (95-1478), 521 U.S. 898 (1997)


  "Although the States surrendered many of their powers to the new Federal Government, they retained "a residuary and inviolable sovereignty," The Federalist No. 39, at 245 (J. Madison). This is reflected throughout the Constitution's text, Lane County v. Oregon,  7 Wall. 71, 76 (1869); Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700, 725 (1869), including (to mention only a few examples) the prohibition on any involuntary reduction or combination of a State's territory, Art. IV, §3; the Judicial Power Clause, Art. III, §2, and the Privileges and Immunities Clause, Art. IV, §2, which speak of the "Citizens" of the States; the amendment provision, Article V, which requires the votes of three fourths of the States to amend the Constitution; and the Guarantee Clause, Art. IV, §4, which "presupposes the continued existence of the states and . . . those means and instrumentalities which are the creation of their sovereign and reserved rights," Helvering v. Gerhardt, 304 U.S. 405, 414-415 (1938). Residual state sovereignty was also implicit, of course, in the Constitution's conferral upon Congress of not all governmental powers, but only discrete, enumerated ones, Art. I, §8, which implication was rendered express by the Tenth Amendment's assertion that "[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

  The Framers' experience under the Articles of Confederation had persuaded them that using the States as the instruments of federal governance was both ineffectual and provocative of federal state conflict. See The Federalist No. 15. Preservation of the States as independent political entities being the price of union, and "[t]he practicality of making laws, with coercive sanctions, for the States as political bodies" having been, in Madison's words, "exploded on all hands," 2 Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, p. 9 (M. Farrand ed. 1911), the Framers rejected the concept of a central government that would act upon and through the States, and instead designed a system in which the state and federal governments would exercise concurrent authority over the people--who were, in Hamilton's words, "the only proper objects of government," The Federalist No. 15, at 109. We have set forth the historical record in more detail elsewhere, see New York v. United States, 505 U. S., at 161-166, and need not repeat it here."


JT Coyoté

"An Unconstitutional Act is not a law;
it confers no rights; it imposes no duties;
it affords no protection; it creates no office;                                                   
it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative
as though it had never been passed."

--U.S. Supreme Court,
Norton V. Shelby County
118 U.S. 425, 442
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

Online JT Coyoté

    Moderator
    Member
    *****
    Posts: 3,619
    "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
        View Profile
        Email
        Personal Message (Online)

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #43 on: October 24, 2010, 02:05:39 am »

We The People must reclaim our Constitution.

Whether we care to admit it or not, it is well past time for the people to break their attachment to the left/right, Republican/Democrat, liberal/conservative, false political paradigms.  "The People must reclaim our Constitution," expounded State Senator Charlie Duke in his speech before the crowd at the Colorado State Republican Convention in June of 1996.  Charlie knew all to well the face of the peoples enemy. He also knew the only way to peacefully defeat the nation usurping corporate bankers, was to apprise the people of the power of the Constitution; that they should arm themselves with it, and know how to use it.

Yes, the solution is the Constitution with it's 9th Amendment protected Rights -- each individual holds these Rights as Inalienable by birth, together we bring them into action through the 10th Amendment power of each State.  Lawful constitutional clout, aimed directly at the titles of nobility fondling globalist power brokers, the haters of individual liberty.  Thomas Jefferson hit the nail on the head, with the following unambiguous words:


"I have sworn upon the altar of almighty God,
eternal hostility against every form of tyranny
over the mind of man."


We must say NO to the Corporate Statists and their fraudulent parties. NO to their coerced tax legislation funded Wall Street banks, and their Goebbels-esque main stream media propaganda machine which promotes this agenda. They march together lockstep, connected at the hip, they're hell-bent on turning the United States into a sub-state, North American Union, third world multi-cultural fiefdom, ripe for culling.  What's left will be merged into the elite's global tyranny envisaged by F.A. Hayek in his 1944 book The Road to Serfdom. Our only hope is if We the people of each state, pull together reclaiming the Constitutional United States. This will terminate our slide into neo-feudalism. It will mean arousing folks into frightful awareness and educating as many as we can.  Again Jefferson foresaw our plight:

"Fear can only prevail when victims
are ignorant of the facts."


Unfortunately, we have been long-term hoodwinked by the global corporate bankers by their preferred method of political divide and conquer -- corporate commandeering of the Party system.  Formally created in the French Parliament in the 1700s, the party system cleaved government administration along philosophical lines. By splitting policies and programs into parties, this eventually became that particular party's niche. Because there is no separation of corporation and state, the lions share of funding for both political parties today is from corporate banking coffers. 

In other words, they completely control the two major political parties.  Together, we must unite in our Inalienable power to halt this incremental dismantling of the ideas of the Founders even of the Constitution itself.  As Reform Candidate Pat Buchanan stated in his stump speeches during the 2000 presidential campaign:

"The Democrats and the Republicans are the two
wings of the same bird of prey, which is feasting
upon the Constitution and the American people."


From the beginning, George Washington saw the destructive liabilities of party factioning. Though he is characterized today as a federalist, his pro-individual and state sovereignty stand is well publicized.  In his July 6th, 1796 letter to Thomas Jefferson, Washington recollected:

"I was no party man myself, and the first
wish of my heart was, if parties did exist,
to reconcile them."


So here we are, dealing with the same imperial interests we thought were expelled from our shores 229 years ago. The same elitist machine that America supposedly defeated in our War for Independence.   Unfortunately the enemy just went underground to wage a covert war of intrigue, infiltration, and subterfuge instead.  Founding Father and signer of the Declaration of Independence Benjamin Rush characterized it this way:

"The American war is over; but this is far from being the case
with the American revolution. On the contrary, nothing but
the first act of the drama is closed."


This "Cold banking War" turned hot for the first time in the War of 1812. Pressed service on the high seas and piracy by the British was touted publicly as the reason. More likely, it was because of Congress and Madison's decision not to recharter the British owned First Bank of the United States. Madison summed up his reasons for not renewing the charter, this way:

"History records that the money changers have used every
form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible
to maintain their control over governments by controlling
money and its issuance."


Thomas Jefferson reiterates Madison, beginning with a hope, then a fear, and finally a forewarning:

I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of
our moneyed corporations, which dare already to
challenge our government to a trial of strength,
and bid defiance to the laws of our country."

-- To George Logan, (Nov. 1816)


The bank mania is raising up a moneyed aristocracy in
our country which has already set the government at
defiance, and although forced at length to yield a little
on this first essay of their strength their principles are
un yielded and unyielding. These have taken deep root
in the hearts of that class from which our legislators are
drawn, and the sop to Cerberus from fable has become
history. Their principles lay hold of the good, their pelf
of the bad, and thus those whom the Constitution had
placed as guards to its portals, are sophisticated or
suborned from their duties."
-- To Dr. J.B. Stuart, (1817)


This long Cold War for conquest of America re-established itself in the form of the Second  Bank of the U.S. being chartered in 1816. This came as a result of political pressure over the war debt owed European bankers who helped finance the war of 1812. Madison understood this type of covert economic war. He knew it was planned long before the ink was dry on Cornwallis' signature of surrender to Washington at Yorktown.

In 1836, the fiat debt fraud created by these corporate banksters, was already sucking the life out of the nations economy.  Andrew Jackson, also understanding the banker's scheme, drove a stake so deep in the heart of the Second Bank of the U.S. beast, it took 77 years before the private banking monster was sufficiently out of our national memory, for the creature to rise once again.  It was brought back to life in 1913 as the Federal Reserve Bank. Jackson was an ardent proponent of a strong 10th Amendment in the states to check federal power, including European banking interests with state branch banking on their mind.  To get around Jackson's 1836 "I Killed the Bank," federal prohibition, the corporate bankers went after the 10th Amendment in a very sneaky way which Jackson foresaw. On this subject he had this to say:

"Unless you become more watchful in your states
and check the spirit of monopoly and thirst for exclusive
privileges you will in the end find that... the control
over your dearest interests has passed into the hands
of these corporations."


The bankers knew if they could force division between the agrarian South and the industrial North provoking a war and then loaning funds to both sides they could use popular opinion against the 10th Amendment. They began fanning the flames, manipulating the rhetoric of slavery.   Funded by the corporate European banking elite, paid provocateurs initiated hyperbole in the press, started riots in the streets, steered well meaning groups into acts of violence, which successfully silenced all meaningful state and congressional debate to resolve the slavery issue. Banker money provocateured the first shots at Fort Sumter, and the Civil War erupted.

Suffice it to say, this spelled the beginning of the end of our national sovereignty by 1871. The reverberations of our relative collective ignorance of the facts surrounding and initiating the Civil War and the Carpetbaggers joke called "Reconstruction," are amplified in the mistakes we are making today. In the following quote, Lincoln enunciates what we should all know -- he states clearly what we should be loudly demanding. He voices what we must remind our representatives and judges of incessantly:

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress
and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but
to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."


It is up to us to make necessary changes using our Right-filled responsibility under the inspired methods laid out in our Constitution. Once folks see the incremental craftiness of this globalist confiscation of our birthright, when it is finally realized and understood, it impacts so deeply, it is as if they had always known it -- it is that clear.  The States and WE the people must unite around our mutual Constitutional contract -- only then can we honestly begin to halt and reverse this slow multi-generational takeover.

*******

JTCoyoté

“The Founders set up the 1st Amendment so religion could never become
a divisive tool of faction to destroy the People’s government. If only they
could have foreseen how powerful corporations would accomplish the
same terrible deed -- to manipulate, direct, and control government to the
detriment of the people and the destruction of Liberty.
~JTCoyoté

 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

Online JT Coyoté

    Moderator
    Member
    *****
    Posts: 3,619
    "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
        View Profile
        Email
        Personal Message (Online)

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #44 on: September 07, 2013, 04:51:08 pm »


We have the Right of RECALL of any or ALL government office holders... regardless of any repugnant intervention by "ruling, statute, regulation, or so-called law" to the contrary.

Pg 2: What needs to be done!
http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc96732/m1/1/high_res_d/RL30016_2012Jan05.pdf

[...]

(From the third paragraph of page 2, of the above link. ~JT)

As to removal by recall, the United States Constitution does not provide for nor
authorize the recall of United States officers such as Senators,Representatives,
or the President or Vice President, and thus no Member of Congress has ever
been recalled in the history of the United States. The recall of Members was
considered during the time of the drafting of the federal Constitution in 1787,
but no such provisions were included in the final version sent to the states
for ratification, and the specific drafting and ratifying debates indicate an
express understanding of the framers and ratifiers that no right or power to
recall a Senator or Representative in Congress exists under the Constitution.

[...]




The 1787 Constitution is NOT the Unanimously Recognized and Ratified Constitution. The use of the 1787 Constitution as the foundation and selective interpretation for law by the Court, is one of the best hidden scams the globalists have used against us since the civil war. The Unanimously Recognized and Ratified Constitution and Bill of Rights of December 15, 1791, IS the True Organic Law for the united States of America!

The Power and Right of Recall, and any other remedy not specifically delegated to the federal government by the Constitution are found among the powers of the States, and in the overarching Rights of the people regardless of State, in the following two Constitutional Articles of Amendment...

Article 9 of the Bill of Rights

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,
shall not be construed to deny or disparage others
retained by the people."


Article 10 of the Bill of Rights

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved
to the States respectively, or to the people."


THE LAW IS CLEAR, THE CRIMINALS ARE IN BREACH OF THE CONTRACT AND OATH OF THEIR OFFICE AND AGENCY... THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO RECALL THEM!

JTCoyoté

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever
may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the
dictates of our passions, they cannot alter
the state of facts and evidence."

~John Adams
 

 

JTCoyoté

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. InfoWarrior
  • *****
  • 258
    Posts
  • "I Shall Never Surrender!" "Remember The Alamo!"

Online JT Coyoté

    Moderator
    Member
    *****
    Posts: 3,619
    "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
        View Profile
        Email
        Personal Message (Online)

Re: Our 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolve, Will Defeat the New World Order!
« Reply #45 on: January 09, 2014, 02:41:39 pm »

This clause, Article VI Section 2 of the Constitution...

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."(underlining and coloring is mine for emphasis)

...does NOT give carte blanc and overarching supremacy to any federal law and or treaty. If the law or treaty are in any way at odds with the Constitution.... from the first "WE THE PEOPLE" in the Preamble to the last 3 words of the 10th Amendment, "...TO THE PEOPLE" is supreme.

THE CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND... NO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL LAW, AND CERTAINLY NO TREATY, CAN SUPERSEDE IT!!!!!

Any federal law, regulation, signing statement, executive order, or any other edict that doesn't square precisely with the Constitution, as is also the case with any state law, regulation, or edict, would be, according to the Article VI Supremacy Clause as upheld by Marbury vs Madison, the same as no law at all, and need not be adhered to nor enforced...

This understanding and knowledge was the basis of the 10th Amendment movement of the 1990's that spread like wild fire in 1994-95. It gained enough steam under the radar to be of sufficient threat to the globalists that they provocateured the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building in OKC. Through the media run up and demonization, they blamed their atrocity on We, the Constitutional Patriots.

The stinking, greedy, self-serving, criminal, parasitic, murdering bastards!

JTCoyoté

"Acts which are repugnant to the Constitution
are null and void."
~U.S. Supreme Court
Marbury v. Madison, 2Cranch 5 U.S. (1803)

 

 

Powered by EzPortal